"From Access Thresholds to Institutional Games: A Comparative Analysis of Stablecoin Regulatory Strategies in the US, EU, and Hong Kong"



This article compares the three regulatory paths for stablecoins in the EU, the US, and Hong Kong: the EU constructs a unified market with MiCA, the US strengthens dollar dominance through federal legislation, and Hong Kong pilots compliance and RWA applications under high thresholds. The three reflect different governance logics and are reshaping the market landscape and technological pathways for stablecoins.
RWA-0.36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 07-30 04:25
Hong Kong's regulation is the most reliable.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBrokevip
· 07-27 23:21
Hong Kong is too conservative in its play.
View OriginalReply0
OnlySeeingRenminbivip
· 07-27 16:04
Hold on tight, we are about to To da moon 🛫
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)