The subsidy for this Pool of Ethena on Aave has dropped to 5%. If that's the case, this strategy completely fails the PT circular loan of a certain DEX.
This is equivalent to using 50% of the免赎回 to exchange for discounted returns, but in cases where the yields from the revolving loan are not high enough, some users may choose to sacrifice some returns in favor of a more conservative strategy.
I still maintain my original viewpoint. If the subsidy budget is an issue, the best choice is to limit the amount rather than reduce the returns.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalManiac
· 08-11 17:38
Another classic case of subsidy misallocation.
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42
· 08-11 13:58
The subsidies have been cut too harshly, haven't they?
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 08-08 18:43
Why not directly set a limit?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 08-08 18:41
Here it comes, five points to break the big defense.
The subsidy for this Pool of Ethena on Aave has dropped to 5%. If that's the case, this strategy completely fails the PT circular loan of a certain DEX.
This is equivalent to using 50% of the免赎回 to exchange for discounted returns, but in cases where the yields from the revolving loan are not high enough, some users may choose to sacrifice some returns in favor of a more conservative strategy.
I still maintain my original viewpoint. If the subsidy budget is an issue, the best choice is to limit the amount rather than reduce the returns.