Everyone has their own perception of @recallnet, and I’m no exception!

First, let me share some of the problems I noticed: imagine many Web3 projects as “pop-up stores”—hot today, gone tomorrow. What about past audit reports? They’re like one-time insurance—you pay once, but if something goes wrong, no one’s accountable. Over time, users’ actions and the project’s promises are almost impossible to verify.

My first impression of #Recall was: “Wait, we remember your actions and commitments.” Its continuous audit mechanism isn’t a one-off “buy a report” deal—it follows up in real-time and remains verifiable over the long term. On top of that, its memory layer leaves traces of all operations, so projects can’t casually “clean up” their history.

And finally, AI supports security assessment, making risk detection smarter and more automated.

Suddenly, a clear picture formed in my mind: if L2 helps Web3 scale, allowing more people to use on-chain applications smoothly, #Recall installs a trust engine into Web3. Projects must remain transparent over time, and user actions are recorded, making the whole ecosystem more reliable and sustainable.

Recall is more than just a security tool—it’s like a public credit system for Web3, rebuilding order rather than patching holes. In the future, when people discuss whether a project is trustworthy, they might not have to rely on hype and marketing—they can see the real action history and credit proof through Recall.

In the world of Web3, the rarest resource isn’t technology or capital—it’s real trust. Recall is making trust traceable, verifiable, and lasting.

#RecallSnaps # Recall #CookieSnaps # COOKI
@cookiedotfun @cookiedotfuncn