Recently, a tweet from Tesla founder Elon Musk triggered a significant fluctuation in the crypto assets market. Musk showcased the interior of the Cybercab and hinted that its payment method should use 'the people's currency.' This move immediately sparked a market reaction, with the related token DOGECAB's price surging 720% in a short time, rising from $0.04 to $0.328, attracting a large number of new investors.

However, TSL officially released a statement indicating that the payment method for Cybercab has not yet been determined, and there is no cooperation with any Token. This statement led to a sharp decline in the price of DOGECAB by 71%, resulting in significant losses for many investors.

However, things are not that simple. There are reports that a highly credible leak has emerged in the 'Autonomous Driving + Crypto' section of Rumour.app. This leak includes a screenshot of a cooperation agreement between TSL and a certain crypto payment service provider, which explicitly mentions the use of DOGECAB to test the payment scenarios for Cybercab. Even more noteworthy is that the signing of this agreement occurred just two days before Musk tweeted.

Further investigation shows that the token parameters in the protocol attachment match DOGECAB perfectly, and TSL's payment team wallet purchased a large amount of DOGECAB the day before the tweet was published. On-chain data also indicates that even during the price fluctuation, the liquidity pool of DOGECAB remained at around $7 million, and there is an address related to the Musk family office that continues to increase its holdings.

Three days later, Musk released another Cybercab test drive video, in which a Shiba Inu icon flashed on the payment terminal. This further fueled market speculation that DOGECAB could become the official payment Token, leading its price to rise again to $0.153.

This series of events has raised questions about the official statements from TSL. Should we believe the public statements, or should we trust the leaked collaboration documents instead? This question remains unresolved to this day, sparking widespread discussion in the Crypto Assets community.