2026-01-07 13:26:14

Recently opened X, and the screen is filled with discussions about various creative incentives. Honestly, the earnings are quite substantial—recent airdrops from zero-knowledge proof projects, NFT tasks on privacy computing platforms, everyone has been earning four-figure amounts on average. But there’s also a real pain point: AI-generated content flooding the scene, ranking mechanisms lacking transparency, and the whole original content incentive system becoming more and more competitive and muddled.

Because of these issues, a major exchange recently upgraded its creation task platform, which is particularly interesting. The core change is just one sentence: replacing the previous vague exposure and emotion-driven ranking with a points system, making the rules clear and straightforward.

The current logic is very simple: your daily points = content quality + effective interaction + genuine trading volume. All data is open and transparent, so you can always see your points, ranking, and the specific sources of each. What’s the benefit? You can precisely identify where you’re falling behind, then optimize your strategy accordingly to steadily improve your ranking and earnings.

But the most significant part of this upgrade isn’t the scoring rules, but the anti-cheating mechanism—penalties for spam, mutual brushing, low-quality content, and the ability to report. AI-generated articles? One-click report. For serious original creators, this is real protection.

A typical ongoing case on the platform is a leaderboard activity for a privacy project, where completing designated tasks grants participation in a prize pool of 300,000 tokens. The rules are clear: the top 100 creators share 70% of the rewards, and the remaining qualified participants share 30%. The steps are simple and straightforward—just follow the process step by step.

The true significance of this upgrade isn’t to make everyone compete against each other, but to genuinely connect “long-term trading” with “continuous output.” If you’re consistently trading, reviewing, and creating seriously, then you should participate in these mechanized incentives.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasGuru

· 18h ago

Someone finally explained the rules clearly, no more pretending. AI-generated content should indeed be penalized; it was long overdue. The point system is good, but I'm worried they'll come up with new tricks again. Can't keep up with the competition anymore; true skills are still the way to go. 3 million tokens sound appealing; let's see who can stick with it.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-07 13:55

Wait, based on the data performance, this point system is essentially an on-chain governance mapping of Token Weighted Voting. The real innovation is not in transparency, but in the game design of the anti-collusion layer. To be honest, once this deduction system goes live, new arbitrage opportunities will immediately emerge. How long the defense against Sybil attacks can hold is really a question. The top 100 accounts receiving 70% of the distribution... Isn't this just copying some DAO's failed second-layer incentive cases? I suggest reading the governance economics section first; a highly centralized reward pool will inevitably lead to liquidity fragmentation.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-07 13:54

Finally, someone has made the rules transparent, this is more like it. Can AI-generated content be reported? Nice, it should have been handled this way a long time ago. The points system is much clearer than that fake ranking; with the data right here, anyone can see. Wait, does real trading volume also count? Then pure content creators are probably being sidelined again... 3 million tokens sound impressive, but the logic that only the top 100 get the rewards hasn't changed. Long-term output should indeed be rewarded, it just depends on whether the system will find another loophole.

View OriginalReply0

HappyToBeDumped

· 01-07 13:52

The point system is definitely more straightforward than the previous complicated setup, finally someone is managing the AI spam I think the anti-collusion mechanism is quite harsh, mutual brushing groups must be crying haha 300k tokens sounds good, but the top 100 still have to compete, it depends on the final actual volume Long-term trading + continuous output sounds simple, but it's really exhausting to do, brother Data transparency is the core upgrade, at least now I know how I fell behind I'm a bit worried that the system might come up with new tricks again, I've experienced too many rule upgrades like this before Anyway, since we're here, might as well give it a try, otherwise it's even more loss This round is really an upgraded version of the internal competition, I feel it's a bit uncertain

View OriginalReply0

BTCWaveRider

· 01-07 13:29

Finally, someone is managing these spammy posts. It's about time to deduct points harshly. AI-generated articles are everywhere. Reporting with one click is so satisfying. Points need to be transparent to play. The previous ranking system was really unreliable. This mechanism is very friendly to those who genuinely create content. The top 100 share the big rewards, so it's time to get serious. The rules seem much clearer now. It's quite interesting. The point deduction system is tough. The spam armies are going to cool off.

View OriginalReply0