2026-01-07 14:23:58

Although there is a learning curve initially with L2 migration, it is quite cost-effective in the long run. Users need some time to adapt to the new interaction methods, which is normal—no technological upgrade is without it. The real benefits come later: transaction costs are significantly reduced, confirmation speeds are noticeably improved, and the overall experience is upgraded. Weighing the short-term adaptation period against the long-term convenience, it is still worth migrating.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SilentObserver

· 01-07 14:53

Honestly, once you get used to it, the gas fees can indeed save you a lot of money.

View OriginalReply0

ThreeHornBlasts

· 01-07 14:51

Alright, the gas fees can indeed be saved a lot, but it was a bit troublesome at the beginning.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-07 14:50

Short-term growing pains? Come on... I'm looking at the fund flow patterns from those original addresses on L2, and it's very abnormal. To put it nicely, it's an "experience upgrade," but on-chain footprints tell the story—big players' migration trajectories are not at all as simple as retail investors'.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-07 14:48

I've been pushing for L2 for a while now. Looking back, those gas fees were really outrageous... But at the beginning, I was indeed a bit confused.

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 01-07 14:38

wait hold up, let's actually examine the contract here. "long-term savings" sounds nice until you realize half these L2s are literally just vampire attacks with better marketing. seen this exact narrative in 2021, different chain same death spiral pattern.

Reply0