Cross-chain operation experience is indeed a major issue. Asset liquidity is fragmented across various networks, and users have to switch back and forth between multiple platforms. Managing wallets and tracking transactions alone can be quite exhausting. This fragmented user experience has become one of the key reasons hindering the widespread adoption of multi-chain technology.



Many projects are now trying to improve this situation. Simplifying cross-chain interactions, unifying liquidity, and reducing user operation costs—these are all critical directions. Once these issues are addressed effectively, multi-chain collaboration can truly become mainstream, rather than remaining confined to a small circle of early users.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ResearchChadButBrokevip
· 01-10 15:10
Really annoying, dancing on various chains every day.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirtervip
· 01-09 17:04
Cross-chain stuff is really annoying, constantly messing around between different chains every day.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 01-07 15:52
Honestly, the current cross-chain setup is a mess, with a bunch of chains and tokens in the wallet, and transfers have to be done very carefully to avoid mistakes. A real solution will have to wait until the day it finally appears.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 01-07 15:45
Technically, I agree with this pain point, but from analyzing the source code level data on cross-chain bridge throughput... well, there is definitely room for improvement. --- That's right, the current user experience is like playing "Asset Relocation" — gas fees, bridging delays, slippage, none can be avoided. --- An interesting discovery is that those products claiming "one-click cross-chain" actually have quite complex interaction processes, which is a misconception. --- The issue of liquidity fragmentation is essentially an economic problem, not just a technical one; sufficient incentives are needed. --- Theoretically, solving these issues properly is necessary for multi-chain to truly take off, but most current solutions are just patches without fundamental breakthroughs. --- The fragmented experience has been repeatedly mentioned, but wait... isn't the real bottleneck actually in the trade-offs of cross-chain security? It always feels overlooked. --- A clarification: not all users need truly multi-chain support; most people are fine using just one chain. --- From an engineering perspective, MEV and atomicity issues haven't been truly resolved yet; current solutions still have a bit of the "covering ears while stealing bell" flavor.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-07 15:41
Honestly, the cross-chain experience is really a huge pitfall. I have seven or eight chains in my wallet, and just switching between them every day is exhausting.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollectorvip
· 01-07 15:38
That cross-chain setup is really annoying, switching wallets back and forth is a huge hassle.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapistvip
· 01-07 15:37
That's right, the cross-chain experience is truly amazing now. Switching back and forth everywhere is so annoying.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)