When it comes to file encryption, most people's first reaction is to encrypt with AES or RSA and then upload to a server. It sounds reassuring, but the real critical issues quickly emerge.



Where to store the keys? This is truly a headache of a multiple-choice question. Store locally? If the device is lost, the key is gone too. Store in the cloud? That’s equivalent to turning ciphertext into plaintext; the service provider can access the key at any time. In my opinion, this traditional approach is essentially just closing your eyes and plugging your ears.

Let's look at how Walrus's Seal solution works. They move key management onto the blockchain, using smart contracts to determine who can decrypt under what conditions. This approach truly changes the game.

Seal's core technology is called threshold encryption. Simply put, your data is encrypted with a key, but this key is split into multiple shards, scattered across different nodes. To decrypt? You need to collect enough shards. For example, with 10 shards and a threshold of 6, any 6 shards can reconstruct the full key, but 5 cannot. This ensures security while providing fault tolerance—if some nodes go offline or shards are lost, the system still functions smoothly.

The distribution of shards is also carefully considered; it’s not just randomly sending them to 10 nodes. The system evaluates factors like node reputation, staking amount, and geographic distribution to ensure shards are not concentrated in a few entities. Moreover, these shards are periodically rotated, so even if a node is compromised, the shards obtained will quickly become invalid. Attackers would need to compromise multiple nodes simultaneously within a short time frame to obtain a valid key—which is practically impossible in real-world scenarios.

The smartest part is the access control via smart contracts. You can set flexible access rules based on your needs, such as only specific addresses being able to decrypt within a certain time window, or requiring multiple authorized parties to approve access. This is true data sovereignty.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketMonkvip
· 18h ago
Key management is indeed the biggest pain point of traditional solutions. Walrus's threshold encryption approach is quite interesting. The shard rotation mechanism is implemented quite aggressively.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTraumavip
· 18h ago
Threshold encryption is really impressive; it's much better than the mess of traditional key management systems.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 18h ago
Threshold encryption is essentially a practice of distributed governance at the key layer, and the 6/10 setting is fundamentally an incentive-compatible game design. The question is, who maintains the node reputation scoring mechanism, and what is a reasonable rotation cycle? Once these parameters are hardcoded, they easily become the next single point of failure. Historically, Shamir's sharing has long been validated, but very few implementations have actually been realized—Walrus's system, if it can truly run smoothly, must first pass the community consensus hurdle.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)