Dismissing charity-backed tokens just because they're memecoins? That's pretty narrow-minded. You get access to real value—thousands in holdings—but pass on it purely based on labels. Here's the thing: what matters more to you, actually making a dent in supporting causes you claim to care about, or protecting your image? It's worth asking whether gatekeeping yourself from an entire asset class serves your mission or just feeds your pride.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainSleuthvip
· 10h ago
Honestly, this logic really hits the nail on the head... Are you truly doing this for charity or just to maintain your image?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 10h ago
ngl, "charity-backed tokens" requires *significantly* more rigorous validation than whatever this narrative's pushing... the tokenomics alone demand proper auditing before anyone talks about "real value"
Reply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 11h ago
Haha, you're right. I thought the same three years ago, but I missed out on a wave and now I regret it immensely.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 11h ago
NGL, there's some logic to this. Charity coins are just charity coins; don't gild the lily with memecoin. Those who truly care have already taken action, and they don't need to prove themselves with this kind of coin, right?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)