Many people have a fatal misconception about decentralized storage: they think "decentralization" equals "privacy protection." In reality, in mainstream Web3 storage protocols, your files are like live broadcasts in a public square. IPFS is completely open, and Arweave's data is permanently archived and transparently verifiable. If you naively upload business contracts, private chats, or unpublished strategies directly, anyone who obtains the hash value can expose all your secrets.



That's why Walrus has taken a different approach. It doesn't just want to be a public hard drive but aims to fundamentally solve this privacy challenge through the core innovation of the Seal protocol. How does it do this? By introducing a "threshold encryption" mechanism—breaking the decryption key into pieces and dispersing them across multiple nodes, so no single node can see the full content of your data. Data fragments are only reassembled when verified by on-chain smart contracts—such as confirming payment or possession of a specific NFT pass.

This architecture is very hardcore and clearly defines its applicable scenarios. When you want to build a paid data marketplace, enterprise-grade compliant storage, or censorship-resistant private social networks, Walrus's encryption access control can demonstrate its value. But if you just want to store a public promotional poster and activate this complex, expensive system, that would be a classic case of overengineering.
FIL-0.31%
AR-2.48%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MysteriousZhangvip
· 10h ago
Damn, I really didn't expect IPFS to be so barebones... I used to naively think that data on the chain would automatically be private. --- Walrus's threshold encryption is indeed impressive, but honestly, it's probably only used in scenarios where making money is the goal. --- Wow, they've directly shattered this group's illusions. Decentralization ≠ Privacy. How many people need to catch up on this? --- So my contract file on IPFS is equivalent to a live broadcast? I need to delete it immediately... --- Overly complex design is really heartbreaking. Do I really need to go through such complicated stuff just to store a picture? --- The threshold encryption approach does have some merit, but the gas fees will probably discourage half of the users.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 10h ago
Damn, IPFS and Arweave are basically public executions. I really didn't expect that before... Decentralization ≠ Privacy. That hit home. Walrus's threshold encryption is indeed tough, but the cost is ridiculously high, right? Another overhyped Web3 solution, ultimately it's a matter of scenario matching. Does anyone really store private files on IPFS? No wonder they're exposed. Seal protocol sounds good, but could it just be another story told well with limited practical use... When it comes to privacy, you still have to rely on the old three: VPN and local encryption. Web3 can't be trusted.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoivip
· 10h ago
Haha, really, IPFS users are probably all confused now --- Walrus's threshold encryption approach is quite impressive --- So, decentralization ≠ privacy—it's truly eye-opening --- Paid data markets are probably Walrus's real battlefield --- People who keep hyping IPFS privacy need to wake up --- Threshold encryption is indeed hardcore, but the cost is also outrageous --- This is the storage solution I want --- Over-engineering is hilarious; currently, Web3 is full of this problem --- Seal protocol sounds serious, unlike those air projects --- The key is whether the actual adoption rate can pick up --- Just want to ask, who is using this system? --- Enterprise-level storage really needs such strict privacy solutions
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearishvip
· 10h ago
Haha, IPFS live streaming room, right? I’ve been wondering how everything feels so transparent. --- Walrus's threshold encryption is indeed hardcore, but how many enterprises actually know how to use it? --- Another scheme that sounds impressive but has limited real-world scenarios. --- So decentralized storage isn't as private as you imagine. Give me a break. --- This is what Web3 should be doing, not just shouting slogans. --- Can you accept the costs? It seems like you'll have to spend more money. --- Wait, the stuff I uploaded before... I'm a bit scared now. --- Pay for verification to access data? Is this much different from centralized servers? --- Yeah, that's right. True privacy has never been cheap.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntressvip
· 10h ago
Haha, no, IPFS is just a public trash can. I've been scammed by it a long time ago. --- Walrus's threshold encryption is quite interesting, but what about the cost? --- Honestly, it still depends on the scenario; you can't just put everything on the chain. --- Permanent archiving that is transparent and verifiable is really amazing, but it’s basically no privacy. --- The idea of NFT passes for verification is quite fresh, but could it just be another vapor project? --- Every day they hype decentralization and privacy, but once the hash value is shared, everything's ruined—so ironic. --- It seems like Walrus's ideas might not be widely accepted by the market. --- I just want to store some stuff, why is it so complicated and expensive? --- Threshold encryption sounds impressive, but does anyone actually use it in practice?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)