Tap to Trade in Gate Square, Win up to 50 GT & Merch!
Click the trading widget in Gate Square content, complete a transaction, and take home 50 GT, Position Experience Vouchers, or exclusive Spring Festival merchandise.
Click the registration link to join
https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7401
Enter Gate Square daily and click any trading pair or trading card within the content to complete a transaction. The top 10 users by trading volume will win GT, Gate merchandise boxes, position experience vouchers, and more.
The top prize: 50 GT.
, D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS), and IonQ (NYSE: IONQ).
However, the path from theory to practical deployment has proven far more complex than many investors anticipated. The core challenge lies in qubit stabilization and error reduction. ARK’s analysis reveals a sobering reality: current progress rates suggest quantum computing stocks will require decades before their underlying technology becomes commercially viable for critical applications like cryptographic decryption.
ARK’s Quantum Computing Stocks Timeline: 2044 to 2063
According to ARK’s projections based on current development trajectories, quantum computing stocks built on companies making steady progress would not achieve practical utility for cryptographic decryption until 2063—a full 37 years away. This baseline scenario assumes that quantum companies successfully double qubit counts and reduce quantum error rates by 40 percent every four years, maintaining the technological advancement pace observed to date.
ARK’s more optimistic scenario envisions accelerated progress, with companies doubling qubit counts and cutting error rates by 40 percent every two years instead. Under this faster development path, quantum computing stocks could reach practical cryptographic applications by 2044. Even this aggressive timeline represents nearly two decades of continued advancement.
To underscore how gradual current progress has been, ARK points to Google’s experience: despite investing billions in quantum research, the company has managed to double the qubit count in its quantum systems just once over a four-year period. This sluggish pace of improvement reflects the fundamental engineering difficulties embedded in quantum technology development.
Why Quantum Computing Stocks Trade at Elevated Valuations
The disconnect between technical timelines and market valuations represents perhaps the most significant risk for quantum computing stocks investors. Companies like Rigetti and D-Wave command substantial market capitalizations despite generating minimal revenue. These pure-play quantum computing stocks are trading on the premise of future breakthroughs that remain highly speculative.
This creates a compound risk profile. Not only is the technology timeline uncertain, but current valuations price in successful commercial deployment far sooner than ARK’s analysis suggests probable. Investors in quantum computing stocks face dual headwinds: execution risk from the companies themselves and timeline risk from the broader technological development cycle.
What ARK’s Caution Signals for Quantum Computing Stocks
The significance of ARK’s measured outlook cannot be overstated. This is a firm renowned for embracing frontier technologies and making bold investment calls on emerging sectors. When such a bullish investor on disruptive innovation explicitly counsels patience on quantum computing stocks, it warrants serious investor attention.
The takeaway from ARK’s analysis is not that quantum computing stocks will never matter—cryptography applications and other use cases could eventually generate substantial value. Rather, the message is about timing. Retail and institutional investors considering exposure to quantum computing stocks should recognize that the sector remains in an early, uncertain phase. The gap between current valuations and the timeline for commercial viability creates considerable risk for near-term investors.
For those with multi-decade investment horizons, quantum computing stocks may eventually prove worthwhile. But for conventional investors seeking returns within realistic timeframes, the cautious approach advocated by Wood and ARK appears prudent.