Tap to Trade in Gate Square, Win up to 50 GT & Merch!
Click the trading widget in Gate Square content, complete a transaction, and take home 50 GT, Position Experience Vouchers, or exclusive Spring Festival merchandise.
Click the registration link to join
https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7401
Enter Gate Square daily and click any trading pair or trading card within the content to complete a transaction. The top 10 users by trading volume will win GT, Gate merchandise boxes, position experience vouchers, and more.
The top prize: 50 GT.
, the math produces a minimum cost per ticket of at least $3.3 million, not $10,000.
The Lunar Tourism Market: Setting Realistic Expectations
What does make financial sense? Moon Express’s medium-term business model targets corporate and government clients willing to pay approximately $1.5 million per pound of payload transported to the lunar surface. At that rate, transporting a human passenger weighing 200 pounds would require an investment in the range of $300 million.
This figure, while substantial, becomes less shocking when examining space tourism precedent. Dennis Tito pioneered commercial space travel when he paid $20 million to visit the International Space Station—establishing proof-of-concept for private individuals funding their own orbital experiences. Subsequently, seven additional tourists purchased seats aboard ISS-bound spacecraft at prices ranging up to $40 million each. Russia’s state space agency advertised ISS-bound flights at approximately $45-50 million, and Boeing similarly suggested future CST-100 spacecraft seats would sell for roughly $50 million.
In this context, $300 million for a destination farther away and more exclusive than the ISS becomes more understandable than initially apparent. Should lunar tourism eventually develop, a well-capitalized billionaire might rationally choose to invest such sums for an experience unavailable to the orbital-flight crowd.
The Reality Check
However, this analysis still leaves the original claim of $10,000 lunar tickets in the domain of science fiction rather than probable reality. The mathematical framework does not support such dramatic cost reductions given current technology and established industry economics. While space tourism has proven commercially viable at the ISS price point, the additional distance and technical complexity of lunar missions introduce costs that cannot disappear through efficiency improvements alone.
The future of lunar space tourism likely exists somewhere between fantasy and present economics—probably requiring investments that remain accessible only to the exceptionally wealthy, yet substantially higher than popular-culture estimates suggest. The Moon remains expensive to visit, whatever the promotional timelines promise.