💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinCC 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to Canton Network (CC) or its ongoing campaigns for a chance to share 3,334 CC rewards!
📅 Event Period:
Nov 10, 2025, 10:00 – Nov 17, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 Related Campaigns:
Launchpool: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48098
CandyDrop: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48092
Earn: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48119
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original content about Canton (CC) or its campaigns on Gate Square.
2️⃣ Content must be at least 80 words.
3️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostTo
Why Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin Wallets Can't Be Unlocked With 24 Words
Despite widespread social media claims in 2025, Satoshi Nakamoto’s estimated 1.1 million bitcoin holdings cannot be unlocked using a 24-word seed phrase because the BIP39 standard was introduced years after the pseudonymous creator’s activity ended.
BIP39 and Satoshi Nakamoto: Why Modern Seed Phrases Don’t Apply
Viral posts on X, formerly Twitter, have fueled speculation throughout 2025 that a simple sequence of 24 words could grant access to Satoshi Nakamoto‘s vast bitcoin fortune, valued at approximately $111 billion as of Nov. 12, 2025, when bitcoin traded around $101,702 per coin.
For instance, one post from Nov. 10, 2025, stated: “Fun fact: 24 words in the right order can unlock 111 billion. That fact should scare you,” emphasizing the supposed vulnerability.
This same X post drew the attention of the lead researcher at Galaxy Digital, Alex Thorn, and Sani, the onchain analyst and operator of timechainindex.com. “Fake news, dumb slop,” Thorn stated to the individual who posted the ‘Fun fact.’ “Satoshi’s coins are spread across many pay-to-public-key (P2PK) addresses… i.e., many public private key pairs, not one,” Thorn quipped.
The Galaxy researcher further added:
Timechainindex founder Sani agreed. “22,471 private keys to be exact, to unlock 1,123,540 BTC,” he stated. “Good luck to all those brave retarded souls who think they can crack even 1 of those.” Sani can often be seen debunking hyped X posts talking about big onchain moves with no substance behind them.
Blockchain analytics platforms, such as Arkham Intelligence, publicly track these addresses, showing Nakamoto has never transacted since 2010, yet the posts persist as misinformed clickbait. The core of these claims revolves around BIP39, a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that standardizes mnemonic seed phrases—groups of words representing cryptographic keys—to simplify wallet recovery.
Proposed on Sept. 10, 2013, BIP39 allows users to generate deterministic wallets from 12- or 24-word phrases derived from a 2,048-word list, providing 128 to 256 bits of entropy. This system has become ubiquitous in modern cryptocurrency wallets, enabling secure backups without exposing raw private keys. However, Satoshi, who mined bitcoin from January 2009 through 2010 and was last active in public in December 2010, operated before this standard existed.
Read more: Bitcoin’s Scalability Foreseen by Satoshi Nakamoto to Outpace Visa, Historic Email Reveals
Nakamoto’s final public message on Dec. 12, 2010, addressed denial-of-service vulnerabilities in Bitcoin’s software, marking the end of their involvement long before mnemonic phrases became a feature. As a result, applying BIP39 retroactively to Satoshi’s wallets misrepresents the technology’s timeline and applicability. Basically, early versions of Bitcoin software, used by Satoshi, generated raw private keys—256-bit numbers represented in hexadecimal or other formats—without the user-friendly mnemonic conversion introduced later.
These keys were stored directly in wallet files, requiring exact knowledge or possession to access funds, rather than derivable word lists. Satoshi’s addresses, identified through blockchain analysis, hold coins from the genesis block onward, but no modern seed phrase could reconstruct them because the underlying generation method predates BIP39 by years. This historical disconnect means that even if someone possessed a hypothetical 24-word phrase, it would not interface with the original key structure.
You will not win the lottery. This is because the unique possibilities figure dwarfs the estimated 10^78 to 10^82 atoms in the observable universe, often cited as around 10^80, making random guessing equivalent to searching for a specific atom across cosmic scales. Current global computing power, even at 10^21 operations per second, would require an average of 1.8 x 10^48 years to crack such a key—vastly exceeding the universe’s 13.8 billion-year age.
Social media posts often invoke this “scare factor” for engagement, but they overlook that proper key management renders such attacks theoretical at best. Public blockchain data provides irrefutable evidence against any successful access attempts, as all transactions are transparently recorded and monitored by services like blockchain explorers and full nodes.
These persistent myths highlight broader cryptocurrency education gaps, where simplified narratives on platforms like X amplify fears without validity or context, even as bitcoin’s design ensures long-term security through cryptographic principles established in 2009. The engagement shows—While the misinformed X post received more than 1,200 likes, Thorn’s reply only hit 389, and Sani’s saw around 77.
FAQ ❓