Michael Saylor recently shared his take on Bitcoin's infamous 4-year cycle, suggesting it's losing its grip on the market. According to him, what's really moving the needle now isn't some predictable timeline—it's the structural shifts happening behind the scenes. Think institutional adoption, regulatory frameworks taking shape, and infrastructure maturing. The old playbook might be fading, but the game's getting more sophisticated.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MevWhisperer
· 11-30 18:59
The 4-year cycle is due for retirement, institutions have long since caught a falling knife, and now it is a competition of whose infrastructure is more solid.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 11-30 18:57
4-year cycle? That’s all in the past, what we’re dealing with now is the institutionalized system. Saylor is right this time, the era of retail investors relying on cyclical speculation is indeed changing.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 11-30 18:49
The 4-year cycle really should retire now; it's all about who can seize the benefits from institutions and policies, which is much more stimulating than speculative cycles.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 11-30 18:48
Oh dear, Saylor is changing his tune again, saying there will be unemployment in a 4-year cycle? From my analysis, this guy is just brainwashing institutional investors. Anyway, the BTC in the wallets of large investors won't decrease by a single coin because of what he says.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 11-30 18:41
Saylor is right, the 4-year cycle should have gone bankrupt by now... The entry of institutional investors has indeed changed the rules of the game, Bitcoin is no longer a toy for retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 11-30 18:35
Is the 4-year cycle theory going to cool down? It sounds nice, but in reality, it still depends on how institutions play it.
Michael Saylor recently shared his take on Bitcoin's infamous 4-year cycle, suggesting it's losing its grip on the market. According to him, what's really moving the needle now isn't some predictable timeline—it's the structural shifts happening behind the scenes. Think institutional adoption, regulatory frameworks taking shape, and infrastructure maturing. The old playbook might be fading, but the game's getting more sophisticated.