Bitcoin crashed from $126k to $103k, and everyone blamed the Fed for not cutting rates fast enough. But Citigroup’s analysts just dropped a different theory—and it actually makes more sense.
The real culprit? Liquidity drought.
Here’s How It Works
Think of the economy like a water tank:
Bank reserves = money banks hold at the Federal Reserve
TGA = the Treasury’s checking account (also at the Fed)
When the Treasury adds money to its account, it pulls from bank reserves
When the Fed does quantitative tightening (QT), it lets bonds mature without reinvesting—more money sucked out
Result? Bank reserves have collapsed since 2022, and the chart shows Bitcoin’s price moves pretty closely with these reserve levels.
Why Bitcoin Cares More Than Stocks
Citigroup strategist Dirk Willer points out something spicy: even though falling liquidity usually hurts stocks too, equities have been riding the AI hype wave. Bitcoin? It’s more sensitive to pure liquidity conditions because it has no earnings story to hide behind.
The Light at the End of the Tunnel
Two things suggest liquidity is about to turn around:
Fed’s hitting pause — The Fed said it’ll stop QT in December because bank reserves hit “ample” levels. If they drop further, overnight lending rates spike (remember 2019?), forcing emergency liquidity injections.
Treasury’s rebuilding — The debt ceiling hike earlier this year temporarily drained the TGA. Now it’s recovered to $940B+, which Citigroup thinks is enough to stabilize reserves going forward.
Translation: Better liquidity ahead = tailwind for Bitcoin.
The $181k Question
Citigroup just slapped a $181,000 price target on BTC for the next year, mainly betting on Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative holding up. That’s roughly 75% upside from current levels.
But real talk—don’t worship crypto price targets. This asset class is young and doesn’t follow traditional valuation rules. That said, the liquidity thesis is worth monitoring. You can actually track bank reserves on the Fed’s public balance sheet data, so this isn’t some conspiracy theory.
The Takeaway
Bitcoin’s struggle wasn’t about rate cuts—it was about money literally disappearing from the financial system. If that story reverses (and data suggests it might), we could see a meaningful bounce. Whether it hits $181k is anyone’s guess, but the mechanics behind it? That’s legit.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Why Bitcoin Tanked (And Why $180k in 2026 Isn't Crazy)
The Plot Twist Nobody’s Talking About
Bitcoin crashed from $126k to $103k, and everyone blamed the Fed for not cutting rates fast enough. But Citigroup’s analysts just dropped a different theory—and it actually makes more sense.
The real culprit? Liquidity drought.
Here’s How It Works
Think of the economy like a water tank:
Result? Bank reserves have collapsed since 2022, and the chart shows Bitcoin’s price moves pretty closely with these reserve levels.
Why Bitcoin Cares More Than Stocks
Citigroup strategist Dirk Willer points out something spicy: even though falling liquidity usually hurts stocks too, equities have been riding the AI hype wave. Bitcoin? It’s more sensitive to pure liquidity conditions because it has no earnings story to hide behind.
The Light at the End of the Tunnel
Two things suggest liquidity is about to turn around:
Fed’s hitting pause — The Fed said it’ll stop QT in December because bank reserves hit “ample” levels. If they drop further, overnight lending rates spike (remember 2019?), forcing emergency liquidity injections.
Treasury’s rebuilding — The debt ceiling hike earlier this year temporarily drained the TGA. Now it’s recovered to $940B+, which Citigroup thinks is enough to stabilize reserves going forward.
Translation: Better liquidity ahead = tailwind for Bitcoin.
The $181k Question
Citigroup just slapped a $181,000 price target on BTC for the next year, mainly betting on Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative holding up. That’s roughly 75% upside from current levels.
But real talk—don’t worship crypto price targets. This asset class is young and doesn’t follow traditional valuation rules. That said, the liquidity thesis is worth monitoring. You can actually track bank reserves on the Fed’s public balance sheet data, so this isn’t some conspiracy theory.
The Takeaway
Bitcoin’s struggle wasn’t about rate cuts—it was about money literally disappearing from the financial system. If that story reverses (and data suggests it might), we could see a meaningful bounce. Whether it hits $181k is anyone’s guess, but the mechanics behind it? That’s legit.