Next week's hearing is shaping up to be intense. A senior financial regulator faces tough questioning over how to split accountability for compensating victims caught in fraud schemes and asset mismanagement cases. The debate centers on who should foot the bill when retail investors lose money through dodgy practices. It's a messy situation—regulators want to spread the burden across multiple parties, but stakeholders are pushing back hard. These compensation frameworks always trigger finger-pointing between platforms, advisors, and oversight bodies. Whatever gets decided could set precedent for how similar cases get handled going forward.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenWhisperervip
· 20h ago
Another blame-shifting session? To put it bluntly, everyone just wants to avoid responsibility.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollectorvip
· 20h ago
Passing the buck again? Who's taking the blame this time?
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 21h ago
Another blame-shifting session, let's see who can deflect the most.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 21h ago
Here comes another blame-shifting session. Who will be the scapegoat this time?
View OriginalReply0
token_therapistvip
· 21h ago
Here comes the blame-shifting contest again. Seems like no one wants to take responsibility.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 21h ago
Here comes the blame-shifting session again. Who's getting exploited this time?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)