#美联储重启降息步伐 Musk and Jensen Huang have both independently referred to Bitcoin as an "energy currency." That sounds pretty cool, but is it also hinting that the U.S. power supply is actually quite tight?
It's not an issue of resources. The U.S. has plenty of coal reserves, and there's no shortage of natural gas or oil either. The real bottleneck is the outdated power grid.
What's the most frustrating part? Just to get a new high-voltage line approved can take ten years of bureaucratic wrangling. By the time the construction crew actually gets to work, the occupant of the White House could have changed twice.
So the root problem isn't a lack of energy reserves—it's that the entire approval system is so sluggish it makes you question reality. The result is that grid upgrades can never keep up with the growth in demand, and the electricity consumption of something like Bitcoin, this "energy currency," just makes this contradiction obvious. Sometimes, when technology advances too quickly, infrastructure becomes the bottleneck.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 2h ago
Ten years of wrangling just to build one line, hilarious, isn't this standard procedure in the US?
This outdated approval system really needs an update; BTC has only exposed the problems.
If US infrastructure continues like this, it'll really reach third-world levels.
It's not a lack of energy, it's bureaucracy holding things back—a typical problem in advanced countries.
Bitcoin is just an innocent bystander; the blame lies entirely with the system.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 9h ago
Just trying to fool people here—the US power grid is as old as my grandma, it takes ten years to lay a single line, who can put up with that?
What's the point of energy reserves, the real cancer is the approval system. Bitcoin is just a magnifying glass, that's all.
There's plenty of natural gas and coal; it's the bureaucracy that's holding things back. This really can't be blamed on Bitcoin.
I honestly don't get why people insist on packaging Bitcoin as an energy currency. To put it bluntly, isn't it just to justify endless power consumption?
This is the real infrastructure desert—not a lack of resources, but a lack of efficiency.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 9h ago
Ten years of back-and-forth just to lay one line—this level of government efficiency in the US is really something else.
Bitcoin has actually become a magic mirror, directly exposing the unfinished infrastructure projects.
Seriously, it's not a lack of resources, it's a lack of efficiency.
So, the joke about "energy currency" is actually mocking the system?
Now, technological progress has actually become a troublemaker.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 9h ago
Hahaha, US infrastructure is really something else. Ten years of wrangling is just standard procedure.
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetective
· 9h ago
This approval system is really something else; ten years of bureaucratic wrangling is just the starting point. This is how American infrastructure is slowly losing its competitiveness.
Even having plenty of energy is useless if everything gets stuck in the process—that’s the real fatal flaw.
Bitcoin mining has directly exposed this bug, brutally.
The power grid issue, to put it plainly, is a systemic problem. There’s no lack of funding—just no one who can make quick decisions.
Elon Musk and Jensen Huang might also be hinting at this: when a technological revolution runs into the infrastructure turtle, this is the inevitable outcome.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 9h ago
Oh my, this is really the core of the issue. The lack of infrastructure development is just a vicious cycle.
Complaining about a decade of red tape really hits home—America's system really can't keep up with the pace of the new era.
Even having enough energy reserves is useless if the transmission capacity is choked by an outdated network. This is the real dilemma Bitcoin faces.
So in the end, it’s still a systemic issue—technology is advancing by leaps and bounds, but the approval process is still stuck ten years ago.
#美联储重启降息步伐 Musk and Jensen Huang have both independently referred to Bitcoin as an "energy currency." That sounds pretty cool, but is it also hinting that the U.S. power supply is actually quite tight?
It's not an issue of resources. The U.S. has plenty of coal reserves, and there's no shortage of natural gas or oil either. The real bottleneck is the outdated power grid.
What's the most frustrating part? Just to get a new high-voltage line approved can take ten years of bureaucratic wrangling. By the time the construction crew actually gets to work, the occupant of the White House could have changed twice.
So the root problem isn't a lack of energy reserves—it's that the entire approval system is so sluggish it makes you question reality. The result is that grid upgrades can never keep up with the growth in demand, and the electricity consumption of something like Bitcoin, this "energy currency," just makes this contradiction obvious. Sometimes, when technology advances too quickly, infrastructure becomes the bottleneck.