💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinPORTALS# 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to PORTALS, the Alpha Trading Competition, the Airdrop Campaign, or Launchpool, and get a chance to share 1,300 PORTALS rewards!
📅 Event Period: Sept 18, 2025, 18:00 – Sept 25, 2025, 24:00 (UTC+8)
📌 Related Campaigns:
Alpha Trading Competition: Join for a chance to win rewards
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47181
Airdrop Campaign: Claim your PORTALS airdrop
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47168
Launchpool: Stake GT to earn PORTALS
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/articl
The path of DOGE's ETF hides Wall Street's "Meme Co-optation Technique"
BitKoala reported on September 19 that in September 2025, a slightly ironic code flashed on the electronic screens of the New York Stock Exchange – DOJE. This encryption asset, marked by a Shiba Inu avatar, was just a programmer's joke eight years ago, but now it has logged in to Wall Street as an exchange-traded fund (ETF), managing hundreds of millions of dollars in assets. When the seemingly contradictory concept of "DOGE ETF" becomes a reality, a game of taming between internet memes and TradFi officially begins. The essence of this taming is both a compromise of grassroots culture to capital power and the financial system's incorporation and transformation of emerging assets.
The listing of DOJE is by no means a coincidence, but a carefully designed regulatory arbitrage experiment. Unlike the years-long approval tug-of-war for Bitcoin ETFs, this DOGE ETF adopts the structure of the Investment Company Act of 1940, holding 25% of DOGE and derivatives through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands, while the remaining assets are allocated to compliant instruments such as U.S. Treasury bonds, cleverly circumventing the SEC's stringent review of spot crypto ETFs. This "curved rescue" design allowed it to pass smoothly within the 75-day review period, becoming the first "asset with no actual use" ETF in the U.S.
This structural innovation reflects a fundamental shift in the regulatory environment. Under the leadership of SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, nominated by Trump, the regulatory attitude towards Crypto Assets has shifted from "suppression" to "reconciliation." Compared to the hardline stance during the tenure of former chairman Gary Gensler, the new management has opened the floodgates for crypto ETFs by simplifying listing standards. As of September 2025, nearly a hundred crypto ETFs have applied for approval, and the successful listing of DOGE undoubtedly provides a replicable template for similar products. The essence of this policy shift is to bring wild crypto assets into the traditional financial regulatory framework, exchanging compliance "shackles" for market access.
The financial packaging is also reflected in the cost structure. The management fee rate of DOJE at 1.5% far exceeds the average level of Bitcoin ETF at 0.25%-0.5%, and this premium is essentially the "entry fee" for meme assets to obtain compliant identification. What is even more intriguing is its tracking mechanism - through the design of holding assets and derivatives via subsidiaries, it avoids regulatory obstacles but may lead to a significant divergence between the ETF price and the DOGE spot. Data shows that a similar structure of Solana staking ETF (SSK) once experienced a tracking error of over 3%, which means that investors might be betting on just the "shadow of DOGE" rather than the asset itself.
II. Triple Paradox: Cultural Fragmentation in the Domestication Process
The birth of the DOGE ETF reveals profound contradictions in the financialization process of meme assets. The first paradox exists on the market function level: ETFs are supposed to lower investment thresholds, but they may amplify the speculative nature of DOGE. Data from the Bitcoin ETF shows that the continuous inflow of institutional funds has indeed reduced asset volatility (30-day volatility dropped from 65% to 50%), but DOGE lacks the decentralized financial infrastructure of Bitcoin, and its price is more reliant on community sentiment and celebrity effects. Morningstar analyst Bryan Armour sharply pointed out: "This normalizes collectibles; DOGE is like Beanie Babies or baseball cards, and ETFs should serve the capital markets, not collectibles."
The paradox at the cultural level is even more striking. DOGE was born from an internet joke in 2013, and the core of its community culture is the mocking spirit of "anti-financial elites," with tipping culture and charitable donations forming a unique value identity. However, the launch of the ETF completely restructured this ecology - as institutions like Grayscale and Fidelity became the main holders, the community logic of "holding is believing" was forced to give way to the financial logic of "net value fluctuations equal returns." DOGE allows investors to hold it through IRA retirement accounts, which means that DOGE has transformed from "internet users' game coin" into "retirement allocation assets." This identity transformation has caused cultural rifts, sparking intense debates on Reddit about "Have we sold our souls?"
The paradox of regulatory philosophy hides risks. The SEC approved DOGE on the grounds of "protecting investors," but the product design may instead obscure risks. Unlike directly holding Crypto Assets, ETF shares cannot be used for on-chain activities; investors cannot participate in the DOGE tipping culture nor perceive the real value flow of the blockchain network. A more hidden risk lies in the tax structure — the cross-border transaction costs and derivative roll-over fees generated by the Cayman subsidiary may erode actual returns by 10%-15% during a bull market, and this "implicit loss" is exactly obscured by the guise of compliance.
III. Power Transfer: The Game Between Wall Street and the Crypto Community
Behind the DOGE ETF is a silent power transfer. The motives of Wall Street institutions are clear: by the end of 2024, Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have attracted $175 billion in funds, and giants like BlackRock urgently need new growth engines. Although DOGE lacks practical value, its $3.8 billion market capitalization and large retail investor base create a market demand that cannot be ignored. Before launching DOJE, the REX-Osprey team had validated the business model of "non-mainstream Crypto Assets + compliant structure" through the Solana staking ETF (SSK). This product matrix strategy essentially harvests the traffic dividends of meme economics using financial instruments.
The SEC's policy shift is characterized by distinct political and economic features. The friendly attitude towards Crypto Assets during the Trump administration contrasts with the cautious approach of the Biden administration, reflecting the struggle between traditional financial capital and tech newcomers. The listing of DOGE coincides with the eve of the 2025 US elections, and Trump has even been reported to plan the launch of a personal meme coin ETF ($TRUMP), turning crypto regulation into a bargaining chip in political games. When regulators shift from being "risk preventers" to "market promoters," the DOGE ETF becomes an excellent tool for testing voter sentiment and capital reactions.
The resistance of the crypto community has shown fragmented characteristics. Early core developer Billy Markus sarcastically remarked on Twitter: "We created a joke against the system, and now the system has packaged it into a financial product," but this voice was quickly drowned out by market enthusiasm. Data shows that in the week before DOGE was listed, the price of Dogecoin increased by 13%-17%. This "ETF expectation arbitrage" attracted a large number of short-term speculators, further diluting the cultural identity of the community. More symbolically, the ETF issuer changed the Shiba Inu logo from a cartoon style to a "financial blue" color scheme. This domestication of visual symbols is precisely a micro annotation of the transfer of power.
Conclusion: The Twilight of Memes or the Dawn of Finance?
The story of DOGE ETF is essentially a typical example of internet subculture encountering the financial system. When the community slogan "To the Moon" turns into "price exposure" in SEC documents, and when Musk's tweets are included in the risk disclosures of the ETF, the decentralized core of meme assets is being reshaped by the process of compliance and institutionalization. This domestication may bring short-term prosperity — analysts predict that DOGE is expected to attract $1-2 billion in funds, but in the long run, can DOGE, which has lost its spirit of mockery and community autonomy, still be called a "meme coin"?
What is even more thought-provoking is that this domestication model is forming a template. Following DOGE, the XRP ETF has closely followed its listing, and the Trump Coin ETF is also in application, which means that meme economy is being mass-converted into financial products. Wall Street uses the ETF as a "scalpel" to clip and reorganize the wild genes of internet culture, ultimately producing "financial genetically modified products" that conform to capital logic. When memes are no longer spontaneous cultural expressions but become quantifiable and tradable financial assets, what we lose may not only be a form of entertainment but also the last bastion of the internet's decentralized spirit.
In this game of domestication and rebellion, there are no absolute winners. The moment DOGE donned the cloak of an ETF marked both the ascent of internet memes to the mainstream stage and the declaration of the end of its innocent era. While the financial markets reap new growth points, they must also swallow the bitter fruit of speculative culture. Perhaps as crypto assets analyst Peter Brandt said: "When Wall Street learns to speak meme language, all that’s left is business."