🚀 Gate Square Creator Certification Incentive Program Is Live!
Join Gate Square and share over $10,000 in monthly creator rewards!
Whether you’re an active Gate Square creator or an established voice on another platform, consistent quality content can earn you token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and massive traffic exposure!
✅ Eligibility:
You can apply if you meet any of the following:
1️⃣ Verified creator on another platform
2️⃣ At least 1,000 followers on a single platform (no combined total)
3️⃣ Gate Square certified creator meeting follower and engagement criteria
Click to apply now 👉
The U.S. judge denied Silvergate Bank's request to dismiss FTX users' lawsuit against it
PANews reported on March 22 that, according to Cointelegraph, Silvergate Bank must face a class action lawsuit from FTX users who claim that the now-defunct bank assisted in the fraud of FTX and its affiliated trading company Alameda Research. In a March 20 order, San Diego Federal Court Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro dismissed Silvergate’s motion to dismiss in June, arguing that the collective group had sufficiently alleged that Silvergate was aware of FTX’s fraud, but benefited from it, and unfairly profited for itself at the expense of FTX users, an allegation that the bank denied. The court held that Silvergate owes a duty of care to FTX customers because its Silvergate trading network, which is designed to help transfer funds to crypto exchanges, is primarily for the benefit of FTX customers. The judge wrote that Silvergate deposited both FTX and Alameda in the bank and “processed transfers and deposits that sent FTX customers’ money to Alameda; FTX initially had no bank account, so customers were instructed to remit money to Alameda’s account.” Predictably, allowing FTX customer funds to deposit into non-FTX accounts will result in fraud and harm the owners of those funds. ”。 Silvergate’s revenue is derived from trading fees and interest deposited into exchange-related accounts. Silvergate’s annual revenue before FTX was $7.6 million, and that figure jumped to $75.5 million after depositing it on the exchange, the order said. The order stated in Silvergate’s motion to dismiss that the bank claimed it did not owe FTX customers a duty of care because the transactions alleged in the lawsuit were “not a material factor in the inability of FTX customers to withdraw funds” — rather, it was the fault of FTX and its co-founder, SBF. Silvergate also claimed that if it rejected a transfer from FTX, the exchange would find another bank — which the judge called “highly speculative” because it was “one of the few banks willing to serve the crypto industry.”