I have a fren who is looking for "new projects and quick money schemes" every day.

Yesterday he shouted in the group: "Fren, this new DEX pool has an APY of 800%, should we go for it?"

I only replied with two words - "Not going to rush."

What I'm looking at now is the money that can be kept.

Like @MMTFinance, using the ve(3,3) mechanism for incentives and using AI Vault for market making, its logic is not "splashing a wave," but rather "creating a machine that can make money on its own."

The truly smart ones are not those who run fast, but those who build the road.

📌 A few thoughts for everyone to consider:

1️⃣ "Dividend + Entry" Double Insurance Mechanism
$MMT Community issuance is in progress: the total fundraising target is approximately 4.5 million dollars, divided into two FDV levels (approximately 250 million dollars / 350 million dollars) open to early HODLers / contributors and the public.

It is worth noting that:
All tokens TGE 100% unlocked, no lock-up.
During the early HODL event, over $277 million in liquidity was locked, indicating high community engagement and quick action.

To me, this means: the project is not simply about "hype and go", but rather about genuinely allowing users to "participate first, invest first", and then enjoy "governance + dividends + liquidity rewards". I am a "code warrior": this approach is much more solid compared to many projects that rely solely on "tasks + airdrops".

2️⃣ Modular Financial Architecture Begins to Take Shape
Momentum is not just a DEX: it has Vaults, market-making strategies, cross-chain channels... a multi-module combination behind it.

For example: it relies on the CLMM (Concentrated Liquidity Market Making) + ve(3,3) model within the Sui ecosystem to streamline the mechanism, making the interests of market makers, stakers, and traders more aligned. DeFi Llama+1

The "attack lion" observed: a sustainable DeFi project must shift from "making quick money" to "governance + structure + ecology." The MMT architecture seems to be taking that step.

3️⃣ I have a concern, which is also the focus of observation.
Although the mechanism is on the way, it is the "execution" that is key. My point of doubt:

100% TGE unlock = instant liquidity, meaning "market pricing is rapid and volatility is greater" - how can regular users stabilize amidst the fluctuations?

Although there are already over a hundred million locked liquidity, can the "sustained rate + fee income" curve continue?

Modularization + cross-chain is the future, but the faster the expansion, the greater the risks: are security, compliance, and experience in sync?

Suggestions for siege lion strategies:
If you are considering participating, these three steps are worth referring to:

First, check if you meet the "early participation" criteria: HODL activity participation, LP pool, contribution points. The early threshold is low, and the return potential is high;
Before participating in market making or locking up, choose liquidity pools with deep liquidity and low slippage (such as SUI-USDC, xSUI-SUI), and observe that the fee curve over the past 24 hours is better than the simple APY figures.

If you choose to wait and see, it is recommended to observe the changes in TVL / token circulation / the number of incoming users 72 hours after the public offering ends, and then decide whether to wait for the next wave.

—

In summary:
@MMTFinance in the Sui ecosystem is not like a fast-running project that can be copied anywhere, but more like a "modular financial building" that is being constructed, connecting market making, locking, strategies, and cross-chain all the way. If these modules can operate on track, it will not only be an opportunity for a new investment but could also be an entry point for a new track. Tech developers, let's start with this and keep an eye on the trends.