🔥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinNIGHT 🔥
Post anything related to NIGHT to join!
Market outlook, project thoughts, research takeaways, user experience — all count.
📅 Event Duration: Dec 10 08:00 - Dec 21 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1️⃣ Post on Gate Square (text, analysis, opinions, or image posts are all valid)
2️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostToWinNIGHT or #发帖赢代币NIGHT
🏆 Rewards (Total: 1,000 NIGHT)
🥇 Top 1: 200 NIGHT
🥈 Top 4: 100 NIGHT each
🥉 Top 10: 40 NIGHT each
📄 Notes
Content must be original (no plagiarism or repetitive spam)
Winners must complete Gate Square identity verification
Gat
We don’t need another on-chain prediction market.
We need a better one.
Most new “decentralized prediction markets” are simply clones of Polymarket/Kalshi, offering less liquidity, reduced trust, and no genuine competitive edge.
Same regulatory grey zone.
Same binary markets.
Different logo.
Same topics.
Same UX.
If you’re not changing the structure of the game, you’re just fragmenting liquidity and making the entire sector weaker.
Polymarket owns the “permissionless, degen, real-world info” lane with deep liquidity on politics, macro, and culture. Kalshi owns the “regulated event exchange” lane with CFTC oversight and clean fiat rails.
For the average user who wants to bet on “Will X happen?” with real money and fast settlement, the job is already done.
→ The core issues today are not “we need more platforms”.
Liquidity is thin and fragmented on long-tail markets.
Regulation is a minefield, split by jurisdiction.
UX and trust still trade off between “fully on-chain but clunky” vs “smooth but custodial.”
A new app with the same mechanics doesn’t fix any of that. It just adds another ghost market with 3 traders and a 15% spread.
When a new market is worth building
New prediction markets only make sense if they:
→ Unlock a new vertical (e.g., DAO governance/futarchy, enterprise forecasting, specialized sectors).
→ Fix liquidity in a fundamental way (novel incentive design, cross-venue routing, market-making infra).
→ Solve a regulatory gap (clear licenses, compliant geos, transparent structure).
→ Radically improve UX & on-ramps (non-crypto native, mobile-first, simple mental model).
If you can’t explain in one sentence what you do differently from Polymarket/Kalshi/Augur—beyond “on another chain”, you’re not innovating, you’re diluting.
Prediction markets don’t need more platforms.
They need: deeper liquidity, clearer rules, better UX, and sharper use cases.
Until a new project tackles at least one of those head-on, launching “yet another prediction market” isn’t building the future.
It’s building noise.
Economad writes✍️