Introduction: QUAI vs LINK Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Quai Network (QUAI) vs ChainLink (LINK) has always been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different cryptocurrency asset positioning.
Quai Network (QUAI): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its positioning as a next-generation proof-of-work Layer 1 for a new decentralized global monetary system.
ChainLink (LINK): Since its inception in 2017, it has been hailed as a decentralized oracle network, and is one of the cryptocurrencies with the highest global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between QUAI vs LINK, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question that investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
QUAI and LINK Historical Price Trends
- 2025: QUAI reached its all-time high of $0.37141 on February 24, 2025, and its all-time low of $0.01813 on November 19, 2025.
- 2021: LINK reached its all-time high of $52.7 on May 10, 2021.
- Comparative analysis: In 2025, QUAI experienced significant volatility, dropping from its peak to near its all-time low within the same year. LINK, on the other hand, has been trading well below its 2021 all-time high.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-21)
- QUAI current price: $0.0189
- LINK current price: $12.264
- 24-hour trading volume: QUAI $26,166.44 vs LINK $11,895,966.22
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 14 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting the Investment Value of QUAI vs LINK
Supply Mechanisms (Tokenomics)
- QUAI: No specific information available about supply mechanism
- LINK: No specific information available about supply mechanism
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Insufficient data to analyze how supply mechanisms drive price cycle changes.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: Insufficient information to determine institutional preference
- Enterprise Adoption: Insufficient information to compare cross-border payment, settlement, and portfolio applications
- National Policies: Insufficient information on regulatory attitudes across different countries
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- QUAI Technical Upgrades: Insufficient information available
- LINK Technical Development: Insufficient information available
- Ecosystem Comparison: Insufficient information on DeFi, NFT, payment, and smart contract implementation
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance in Inflationary Environments: Insufficient data to determine anti-inflationary properties
- Macroeconomic Monetary Policies: Insufficient information on how interest rates and the USD index affect both assets
- Geopolitical Factors: Insufficient information on cross-border transaction demand and international situations
III. Price Prediction for 2025-2030: QUAI vs LINK
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- QUAI: Conservative $0.016632 - $0.0189 | Optimistic $0.0189 - $0.025893
- LINK: Conservative $9.11902 - $12.323 | Optimistic $12.323 - $15.65021
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- QUAI may enter a growth phase, with estimated prices ranging from $0.01707285195 to $0.037939671
- LINK may enter a volatile phase, with estimated prices ranging from $9.4871141715 to $17.1433817485
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- QUAI: Base scenario $0.0437292647946 - $0.057722629528872 | Optimistic scenario $0.057722629528872+
- LINK: Base scenario $20.895843318437325 - $27.582513180337269 | Optimistic scenario $27.582513180337269+
View detailed price predictions for QUAI and LINK
Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and current market trends. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to rapid changes. These projections should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.
QUAI:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.025893 |
0.0189 |
0.016632 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.03180303 |
0.0223965 |
0.01836513 |
18 |
| 2027 |
0.037939671 |
0.027099765 |
0.01707285195 |
43 |
| 2028 |
0.04097484468 |
0.032519718 |
0.01918663362 |
72 |
| 2029 |
0.0507112482492 |
0.03674728134 |
0.0231507872442 |
94 |
| 2030 |
0.057722629528872 |
0.0437292647946 |
0.040230923611032 |
131 |
LINK:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
15.65021 |
12.323 |
9.11902 |
0 |
| 2026 |
19.3015149 |
13.986605 |
10.9095519 |
14 |
| 2027 |
17.1433817485 |
16.64405995 |
9.4871141715 |
35 |
| 2028 |
21.62396268704 |
16.89372084925 |
13.852851096385 |
37 |
| 2029 |
22.53284486872965 |
19.258841768145 |
9.82200930175395 |
57 |
| 2030 |
27.582513180337269 |
20.895843318437325 |
16.507716221565486 |
70 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: QUAI vs LINK
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- QUAI: Suitable for investors focusing on next-generation Layer 1 solutions and potential growth
- LINK: Suitable for investors interested in established oracle networks and wider adoption
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: QUAI: 10% vs LINK: 90%
- Aggressive investors: QUAI: 30% vs LINK: 70%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolio
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- QUAI: High volatility, relatively new to the market
- LINK: Dependency on overall crypto market trends
Technical Risks
- QUAI: Scalability, network stability
- LINK: Oracle security, network decentralization
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may impact both differently, with LINK potentially facing more scrutiny due to its wider adoption
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- QUAI advantages: Potential for high growth as a next-generation Layer 1 solution
- LINK advantages: Established market position, wider adoption in the oracle space
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a smaller allocation to QUAI, larger allocation to LINK for stability
- Experienced investors: Balanced approach, potentially higher allocation to QUAI for growth
- Institutional investors: Primarily LINK for established track record, small QUAI allocation for diversification
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the key differences between QUAI and LINK?
A: QUAI is positioned as a next-generation proof-of-work Layer 1 for a new decentralized global monetary system, while LINK is an established decentralized oracle network. QUAI is newer with potential for high growth, while LINK has a more established market position and wider adoption.
Q2: How do the current prices of QUAI and LINK compare?
A: As of November 21, 2025, QUAI's price is $0.0189, while LINK's price is $12.264. LINK has a significantly higher price and market capitalization compared to QUAI.
Q3: What are the long-term price predictions for QUAI and LINK?
A: By 2030, QUAI's base scenario price range is predicted to be $0.0437292647946 - $0.057722629528872, while LINK's base scenario range is $20.895843318437325 - $27.582513180337269. Both have potential for growth, with LINK projected to maintain a higher price point.
Q4: How do the investment strategies differ for QUAI and LINK?
A: QUAI is more suitable for investors focusing on next-generation Layer 1 solutions and potential growth, while LINK is better for those interested in established oracle networks with wider adoption. Conservative investors might allocate 10% to QUAI and 90% to LINK, while aggressive investors might consider 30% QUAI and 70% LINK.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in QUAI and LINK?
A: QUAI faces risks such as high volatility and being relatively new to the market, as well as potential scalability and network stability issues. LINK's risks include dependency on overall crypto market trends, oracle security, and network decentralization challenges. Both face regulatory risks, with LINK potentially facing more scrutiny due to its wider adoption.
Q6: Which cryptocurrency might be better for new investors?
A: For new investors, LINK might be a safer choice due to its established market position and wider adoption. However, a small allocation to QUAI could be considered for potential high growth. It's advisable for new investors to have a larger allocation to LINK for stability.