The “Road Wars” in Crypto Prediction Markets: The Narrow Gate of Compliance vs. the Wilderness of Freedom

Crypto prediction markets have undergone more dramatic transformation in the past two years than in the entire decade since their inception.

This sector was once one of Web3’s earliest holy grails—a vision of “information alchemy” aiming to refine collective intelligence into pure probability. Yet for years, it remained a high-friction, low-liquidity “decentralized toy.”

That’s no longer the case.

Polymarket set astonishing new trading volume records during the 2024 U.S. presidential election (despite restricting U.S. users), with its odds so accurate that mainstream media used them as benchmarks against traditional polling. Meanwhile, Kalshi—regulated by the CFTC—is bringing (restricted) event contracts to millions of TradFi users via platforms like Robinhood.

The question for prediction markets is no longer “if” but “how.” The industry stands at a crossroads: will it become a compliant hedging tool for Wall Street elites, or a global liquidity “casino” for Crypto-Natives?

BlockWeeks will break down the ongoing “battle of paths.”

I. Executive Summary

Prediction markets are rapidly evolving along two fundamentally different—and often conflicting—trajectories:

1. The “Narrow Gate” of Compliance (TradFi Integration): Led by Kalshi, these platforms pursue full regulatory approval (such as from the CFTC), packaging “event contracts” as compliant financial derivatives to connect with mainstream brokerages like Robinhood. This path is extremely narrow and slow, but once cleared, it offers direct access to vast mainstream capital.
2. The “Wild Frontier” of Freedom (Crypto-Native Evolution): Platforms like Polymarket and those built on Gnosis/Azuro infrastructure prioritize global liquidity, speed, and product diversity. They either operate offshore or focus on underlying technology, playing a regulatory “cat-and-mouse game” and betting that market demand will eventually force regulatory concessions.

BlockWeeks’ core thesis: This isn’t a zero-sum game. In the short term, Polymarket’s “gray zone” will continue to capture the largest liquidity and market attention; but in the long run, regulation (who secures licenses) and infrastructure (who delivers optimal liquidity and clearing frameworks) will shape the ultimate market landscape.

II. The “Surface Unity, Real Differences” of Two Paths

1. The Narrow Gate of Compliance: Kalshi’s “Wall Street Experiment”

Kalshi is taking the most challenging route: directly seeking approval from U.S. regulators, primarily the CFTC.

• Analysis: Kalshi isn’t building a “prediction market”—it’s developing “event derivatives.” It must convince regulators that its contracts (e.g., “Will the Fed raise rates?”) have genuine economic utility and hedging value—not gambling characteristics.
• Progress: Kalshi successfully introduced contracts on economic and weather events, and has started collaborating with platforms like Robinhood.
• Bottleneck: This path faces a very low ceiling, entirely limited by regulatory imagination. The CFTC is extremely cautious and slow to approve “political event” contracts (such as Congressional control), since these cross the “gambling” red line. Kalshi gains safety but sacrifices Crypto’s core—speed, breadth, and permissionless innovation.

2. The Wild Frontier of Freedom: Polymarket’s “Global Casino”

Polymarket is a stark contrast. In 2022, it was fined by the CFTC and restricted in the U.S. for offering unregistered “binary options.” Yet it survived.

• Analysis: Polymarket has proven intense demand for predictions on hot events—elections, regulatory decisions, celebrity news. Its trading volume during the 2024 U.S. election (per public data and Dune Analytics) even surpassed many mid-sized exchanges.
• Strategy: Polymarket’s approach is “offshore operations + future compliance.” It serves users outside regulatory reach (especially the U.S.), while paving the way for a compliant return through acquisitions (like clearinghouse QCX).
• Bottleneck: Polymarket always operates under the threat of regulatory action. Its success depends on regulatory lag. This model captures liquidity but brings significant legal risk.

III. Infrastructure’s “Ice and Fire”: Augur’s Lesson and Gnosis’s Pragmatism

Why did the veteran Augur nearly disappear, while the Gnosis ecosystem quietly flourishes?

• Augur’s Downfall: Augur was an idealistic martyr. It placed excessive faith in “fully decentralized” arbitration. Its complex REP token dispute system proved too slow and costly (gas fees), and easily deadlocked in ambiguous cases. Augur died from its obsession with a “perfectly decentralized Oracle,” sacrificing user experience and liquidity.
• Gnosis/Azuro’s Pragmatism: Gnosis (Omen/Azuro) learned from this. They stopped trying to solve the hardest Oracle problems themselves and pivoted to pragmatism:

1. Gnosis Conditional Tokens: Provides a flexible contract framework for others to build applications.
2. Azuro (Gnosis ecosystem): Focuses on liquidity protocols. It outsources the Oracle problem (to centralized referees or third-party Oracles), and fully optimizes AMMs and liquidity pools.

• Status: Azuro is emerging as the B2B infrastructure layer for GambleFi (especially sports betting). It avoids frontend compliance, offering only on-chain tools. This is a smarter, more scalable layered strategy.

IV. The “Impossible Triangle” of Prediction Markets

Comparing these players reveals an “impossible triangle” in prediction markets. It’s nearly impossible to achieve all three:

1. Decentralization (censorship resistance)
2. Outcome certainty (fast, reliable Oracle)
3. High liquidity (low slippage, deep pools)

Kalshi: Sacrifices ① (fully centralized) for ② and (potentially) ③.

Polymarket: Sacrifices ① (semi-centralized/offshore) for ② (centralized rapid arbitration) and ③ (high liquidity).

Augur: Clings to ① and ②, sacrificing ③ (liquidity dries up).

Gnosis/Azuro: Focuses on providing a framework for ①, leaving ② and ③ to frontend applications.

Notably: As of 2025, every market “winner” (measured by liquidity) has compromised on decentralization.

V. Regulatory Intent and Risks

The core regulatory risk isn’t “on-chain” versus “off-chain,” but “product definition” and “user access.”

1. Gambling vs. Derivatives: The CFTC’s central concern is whether this is “gambling” (subject to state law) or a “hedging/price discovery tool with economic purpose” (regulated by the CFTC). Kalshi is working to prove the latter, while many Polymarket events struggle to escape the former’s suspicion.
2. KYC/AML (user access): This is the gateway to the U.S. market. That’s why Polymarket’s acquisition of QCX matters—it needs not only clearing capability but also a (potentially future) compliant fiat and user gateway.
3. Oracle Manipulation (core risk): In low-liquidity markets or those relying on decentralized reporting, malicious actors can manipulate market prices with minimal capital, or even attempt to manipulate “outcome reporting.”

VI. Real Opportunities Emerging

Setting aside risks, prediction markets are unlocking three clear opportunities:

1. GambleFi’s “Advanced Form”: Prediction markets—especially for sports and current events—are the natural ground for GambleFi. Azuro’s rise as B2B infrastructure proves demand for fairer, more transparent betting protocols.
2. Alpha (excess returns) information source: Polymarket’s odds in the 2024 election and multiple “Will the SEC approve the ETF” events have proven more sensitive than traditional polling and expert analysis. Hedge funds and research institutions are starting (or have already begun) to treat it as a high-value real-time sentiment and information data source.
3. New TradFi Hedging Tools: Kalshi’s true potential isn’t retail speculation on Fed rates—it’s enabling small and medium-sized business owners (farmers, import/exporters) to hedge supply chain risks (e.g., port closures) or policy risks (e.g., tariff changes). This is a trillion-dollar blue ocean.

VII. Three Possible Futures (12–36 Months)

Scenario 1: TradFi Integration (Kalshi Model Wins)

• Path: Regulators (CFTC/SEC) clearly define “event derivatives” and crack down on all “unlicensed” platforms (Polymarket forced to fully exit U.S. and Europe).
• Result: Prediction markets become a niche feature on Robinhood, limited to economic and weather “safe” events. Market size is constrained by regulatory imagination.

Scenario 2: Offshore “Wild West” (Polymarket Model Wins)

• Path: Regulation remains ambiguous, U.S. users continue to access Polymarket and other offshore platforms via VPN.
• Result: Two parallel markets emerge: a small, compliant U.S. market; and a large, high-liquidity, high-risk global offshore market. Crypto-Native players dominate the latter, with liquidity concentrated in hot events.

Scenario 3: Layered Infrastructure (Gnosis/Azuro Model’s Long-Term Win)

• Path: Regulators focus on frontend applications (requiring KYC/AML), but remain neutral or unable to regulate underlying protocols (such as Gnosis Conditional Tokens).
• Result: Gnosis/Azuro becomes the “TCP/IP protocol for prediction markets.” Numerous compliant (e.g., on-chain Kalshi) and non-compliant (next-gen Polymarket) frontends are built on these protocols. The market achieves “frontend compliance, backend decentralization.”

VIII. Strategic Advice for Builders and Investors

The prediction market contest has shifted from “technical implementation” to “regulatory gamesmanship” and “liquidity warfare.”

• For founders:

1. Stop reinventing the wheel: Don’t try to build another Augur (obsessed with perfect decentralized Oracles).
2. Pick your battleground: Lobby in Washington (get licensed, like Kalshi); go to Dubai/Singapore (build global liquidity, like Polymarket); or “sell shovels” (build infrastructure, like Azuro).

• For investors:

1. Bet on the compliance channel: Closely monitor Polymarket’s M&A/compliance moves and Kalshi’s integration progress with mainstream brokerages.
2. Bet on B2B infrastructure: Track adoption metrics (TVL, trading volume, number of ecosystem projects) for infrastructure like Gnosis/Azuro. In a world of regulatory uncertainty, platforms providing tools tend to offer the lowest risk and most stable returns.

Statement:

1. This article is republished from [PANews], with copyright belonging to the original author [BlockWeeks]. If you have any objections to this republication, please contact the Gate Learn team, and the team will process your request promptly.
2. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute investment advice.
3. Other language versions of this article are translated by the Gate Learn team. Unless Gate is mentioned, translated articles may not be copied, distributed, or plagiarized.