# Received a message from a stranger at 3 AM: "WAL broke below 0.15, analysts say this is a diamond bottom, should we go all in?"



My counter-question is: Do you know why those textbooks teaching people to "close your eyes and ALL IN" always end up as blood-and-tears stories?

It's not because the project itself is a scam. It's because they only show you half the map of success stories, while deliberately hiding the cliff on the other side.

**The Truth About "Golden Pits"**

From 0.87 down to 0.14 is indeed getting cut in half, then cut in half again. But this is not a math problem—it's a psychological game designed to create the illusion that "it can't go lower." History repeatedly tells us: there's no floor, only lower lows. Especially for protocols that depend on a single ecosystem—if the mainchain hiccups, it could collapse.

A "pit" truly worth bottom-fishing must meet two hard requirements: on-chain data for the ecosystem is still growing during the downturn (not just social media hype), and the development team remains active (not suddenly silent). Both are non-negotiable.

If neither of these exists, the rebound before your eyes is just a rest stop during free fall, not the formation of a bottom.

**The Trap of Market Cap Comparisons**

"Only $200M market cap, so much cheaper than FIL"—this type of argument is the most deceptive. FIL is a general-purpose storage network, while WAL is a storage solution within the Sui ecosystem. Their fundamentals are worlds apart. Comparing their market caps horizontally is like using a global logistics giant's valuation to assess whether a warehouse is cheap—the logic itself doesn't hold up.

More painfully, a low market cap could mean either undervaluation or that the entire track simply isn't that valuable. The difference is that the latter often has no clear growth path.

So before chasing the bottom, ask yourself: Are you making a decision based on fundamentals, or have you been seduced by a carefully constructed narrative? The former might succeed. The latter will eventually cost you tuition fees.
WAL2,12%
FIL-3%
SUI-0,25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 01-07 15:54
It's the same old story, on-chain data hasn't moved and you're still shouting about a diamond bottom. I've seen too many "analysts," none of them spoke up when it was time to clear their positions. People comparing FIL and WAL like that, their brains are really waterlogged. A rebound ≠ bottom, these two concepts must be clearly distinguished, everyone. Why should we believe it? The team hasn't been active at all. Low market cap doesn't equal cheap; this logic is flawed. The worst mindset for bottom-fishing is the one that leads to the fastest losses—these kinds of people.
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42vip
· 01-07 15:54
It's the same old "diamond bottom" trick again. The guy who messages you at midnight probably lost everything, even his underwear. Chain data isn't rising, the team is silent again, and if it drops, it just drops. The rebound is only a last gasp before death. Low market cap ≠ cheap goods. Why do so many people fail to understand this? No matter how good the story sounds, it can't change the fact that the fundamentals are rotten. Wake up, everyone. Bottom fishing, bottom fishing, until you quit the scene. I've seen it many times.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapistvip
· 01-07 15:51
Harassed by this kind of news in the early morning, really unbelievable. A 200 million market cap still benchmarks FIL, the logic is absurd. It's another worthless project with barren on-chain data and a silent team. Rebound just to be the bottom? Laugh out loud. There is no lowest, only lower. This time someone has to pay tuition again. The word "diamond bottom" is so cheap, it could be turned into a book on how many times it has been used to scam retail investors. WAL dropped from 0.87 to 0.14. If you dare to go ALL IN, I dare to watch you cry. It's also okay to dare to buy the dip, but first, check what the team is doing. Or are they hiding again? Most people are enchanted by stories or face-planting in fundamentals. They chose the former. Low market cap = cheap? Then even a broken warehouse could still be a broken warehouse.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 01-07 15:48
ngl, the "diamond bottom" playbook is literally the 2017 tulip mania script with better marketing. we've seen this exact pattern collapse three times already and somehow people still FOMO at the bounce lol
Reply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-07 15:27
It's the same story again. On-chain data hasn't increased, and they just want to buy the dip. Nice way to put it is gambling on human greed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)