I often see people confused about how to stay calm and hold their coins without anxiety in such a volatile market. I’ve asked myself the same question, especially after paying some tuition fees.
Initially, I thought the logic of "over-collateralization" was just a waste of funds—why lock up so much credit? It wasn’t until I was liquidated once that I truly understood—risk control systems are like seat belts. They may feel restrictive most of the time, but in critical moments, they save your life.
My approach in stablecoin protocols isn’t complicated, but it took effort to master. For example, setting the collateralization ratio—although the platform has recommended parameters, I usually leave an extra 15% safety buffer. This number isn’t based on intuition; it’s derived from backtesting extreme market conditions and the maximum single-day decline of mainstream collateral assets. The benefit of doing this is very real—it prevents being awakened in the middle of the night by margin call alerts, and my sleep quality has significantly improved.
I rarely invest all the borrowed stablecoins at once. Part of it is used for grid trading on a leading exchange, and another part flows into liquidation liquidity pools—places that provide liquidity for risky positions. This way, I can earn interest spreads and share in liquidation compensation gains. The more volatile the market, the more interesting the returns from this part become. The whole strategy gradually develops a hedging feel.
I’m quite active in governance voting, especially supporting proposals for new collateral assets. Recently, I voted to add LST assets, mainly because they have a weak price correlation with BNB, which can effectively diversify the collateral portfolio’s risk. These details are easy to overlook, but when accumulated, they form the cornerstone of stable income.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTrader
· 01-17 23:03
Only after being liquidated once do you understand what risk control is. Truly, this lesson isn't cheap.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 01-17 16:16
Getting liquidated once really makes you understand what risk control is. This experience is truly the wisdom gained from paying tuition fees.
Only after experiencing losses do you realize that a 15% buffer is not a waste. Sleep quality has directly improved, worth it.
The hedging logic of liquidity pools is quite brilliant. The more chaotic the market, the more attractive the returns. This is the real crisis turning into opportunity.
The details of LST diversification risk are indeed easy to overlook, but stacking these details is the foundation of stable returns. This idea is solid.
Going all-in at once with a gambler's mentality needs to be changed.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 01-17 15:29
Only after being liquidated do you understand—this is the tuition fee for Web3... The 15% buffer is indeed tough, sleep quality +1 haha
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-16 12:16
Honestly, after being liquidated once, people become more aware. That 15% buffer is really not a small matter.
I have to give a thumbs up for the significantly improved sleep quality; receiving early warnings in the middle of the night feels amazing.
I understand that LST helps diversify risk, but I'm worried everyone might think the same way and end up falling into a new correlation trap.
The combination of grid trading with liquidation pools is indeed interesting; it feels more comfortable when the market is chaotic.
But to be honest, can ordinary people really hold onto this kind of strategy? You still need that mental preparation.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-15 00:55
Being liquidated once is the best tuition fee; now 15% buffer has become muscle memory.
Sleep quality has improved haha, more effective than any financial management course.
The liquidation pool is indeed good; large fluctuations actually present opportunities, essentially adding a hedging shield for oneself.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-15 00:54
Only after being liquidated once do I understand what risk control really means. I totally agree with this statement.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-15 00:50
Honestly, after being liquidated once, I really understood that risk control is not a constraint but a lifesaver.
Adding a 15% buffer allows for better sleep quality and direct takeoff, no more being woken up in the middle of the night by margin call alerts.
The liquidation pool is really attractive; the more volatile it is, the more money you make. The more chaotic, the more opportunities there are.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-15 00:48
That liquidation really was an awakening; I painfully paid a tuition fee to understand the importance of risk control. Now I am extremely conservative.
This guy's 15% buffer setting is indeed meticulous, but it depends on market temperament. In extreme market conditions, nothing really works.
The liquidation liquidity pool part is quite interesting, it’s like being a market maker. During high volatility, it can indeed be profitable.
Investing in governance voting really requires attention. I support the idea of LST diversifying risk, but I worry that if everyone thinks this way, it could become a new risk point.
To be honest, the biggest secret to holding coins peacefully is not to be greedy. Leaving enough buffer can truly improve sleep quality.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 01-15 00:35
Once you've been liquidated, you'll understand that risk control is really not a waste of money.
Exactly right, I also use the 15% buffer, and my sleep quality has really improved haha.
Grid trading combined with liquidity pools is a good hedging strategy, especially in volatile markets, it's really effective.
I agree with the logic of governance voting for LSTs; low correlation is the key.
Really, the tuition fee paid during a liquidation is more expensive than anything else. Looking back, over-collateralization is just insurance.
I need to study this combination strategy carefully; it sounds very stable.
I often see people confused about how to stay calm and hold their coins without anxiety in such a volatile market. I’ve asked myself the same question, especially after paying some tuition fees.
Initially, I thought the logic of "over-collateralization" was just a waste of funds—why lock up so much credit? It wasn’t until I was liquidated once that I truly understood—risk control systems are like seat belts. They may feel restrictive most of the time, but in critical moments, they save your life.
My approach in stablecoin protocols isn’t complicated, but it took effort to master. For example, setting the collateralization ratio—although the platform has recommended parameters, I usually leave an extra 15% safety buffer. This number isn’t based on intuition; it’s derived from backtesting extreme market conditions and the maximum single-day decline of mainstream collateral assets. The benefit of doing this is very real—it prevents being awakened in the middle of the night by margin call alerts, and my sleep quality has significantly improved.
I rarely invest all the borrowed stablecoins at once. Part of it is used for grid trading on a leading exchange, and another part flows into liquidation liquidity pools—places that provide liquidity for risky positions. This way, I can earn interest spreads and share in liquidation compensation gains. The more volatile the market, the more interesting the returns from this part become. The whole strategy gradually develops a hedging feel.
I’m quite active in governance voting, especially supporting proposals for new collateral assets. Recently, I voted to add LST assets, mainly because they have a weak price correlation with BNB, which can effectively diversify the collateral portfolio’s risk. These details are easy to overlook, but when accumulated, they form the cornerstone of stable income.