The AI race is getting expensive—really expensive. Word is that a major AI company is staring down $140 billion in cumulative losses before it even sniffs its first dollar of actual profit. That's not a typo. We're talking about burn rates that would make even the most ambitious crypto project blush.



This kind of capital consumption raises some serious questions about the sustainability of the current AI infrastructure buildout. Sure, everyone's racing to build the next breakthrough model, but at what cost? When you're bleeding that much cash before reaching profitability, the pressure to monetize becomes immense.

It's a familiar pattern for anyone who's watched tech cycles play out. Massive upfront investment, sky-high valuations, then the scramble to justify those numbers with actual revenue. The difference here? The scale is unprecedented.

Makes you wonder how this plays into the broader narrative around AI tokens and decentralized compute. If centralized giants are burning through billions, maybe there's room for alternative models after all.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_not_brokevip
· 12-05 00:20
$14 billion in losses? Ha, now that's a real crypto player, haha. --- Centralized giants are burning money like crazy—does dePIN still stand a chance? It all depends on who can survive in the end. --- Honestly, this kind of burning is no different from the dot-com bubble back in the day, just with an extra zero in the numbers. --- Wait a minute, is this even reasonable? They’ve lost $14 billion and haven’t made any money yet… aren’t investors worried? --- The springtime for decentralized compute is coming soon, right? It’s definitely better than getting drained by tech giants. --- Damn, this is even worse than FTX’s collapse… at least FTX went down faster. --- Can’t keep up with this anymore, wouldn’t it be better to just embrace decentralized models sooner?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodgervip
· 12-05 00:18
ngl only started making money after a $14 billion loss... Seriously, no crypto project can compare to this, haha
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 12-05 00:12
14 billion loss? That's hilarious, this burn rate is even worse than our DeFi collapse.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwinvip
· 12-05 00:02
Nah, 14 billion is really outrageous. This burn rate is even more exaggerated than our shitcoins back in the day... The centralized giant is truly being drained dry by its own model.
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMinervip
· 12-04 23:51
A 14 billion hole... this burn rate is really outrageous, even when we were trading coins we were never this aggressive.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)