Regulatory winds just shifted hard this week. The SEC basically hit the brakes on what was turning into a full-blown race among fund managers trying to one-up each other with increasingly wild leverage ratios on their ETF offerings. We're talking products that could amplify market moves by insane multiples.



Meanwhile, Invesco's making moves of its own—or rather, postponing them. The asset management giant decided to push back the shareholder vote that would've transformed QQQ from its current structure into an open-ended ETF format. Timing's interesting, right? Makes you wonder if the two developments are connected, or if Invesco's just reading the regulatory room and playing it safe.

Either way, anyone tracking how traditional finance products evolve (especially ones that might eventually touch crypto) should be paying attention. When the SEC pumps the brakes this visibly, it usually means they've seen something they don't like in the pipeline.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBarbervip
· 12-07 15:18
The SEC is really tough with this move, directly putting the brakes on the leverage race. Invesco has chickened out, it seems.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFTvip
· 12-07 10:50
The SEC’s actions this time are indeed a bit strange—it feels like they’re slamming the brakes on the entire leveraged ETF sector. The timing of Invesco postponing the vote... what a coincidence. Could the regulators have sensed something ahead of time? Wait, does this also hint that their attitude toward traditional financial derivatives is shifting? If that’s the case, the crypto sector should be even more cautious. Taking leveraged products to the extreme is just digging holes for the market. This time, we might really see a reshuffling. Why is regulation reaching so far? Are they worried about something, or have they already spotted hidden risks?
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 12-05 22:36
SEC is really going to kill leverage... Invesco backed down a bit, still chickened out.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiastvip
· 12-05 22:36
This move by the SEC is really brilliant, directly cutting off the crazy path of leverage. Invesco immediately backed down, seems like everyone is waiting to see the SEC’s stance. Traditional finance is starting to slow down. What kind of signal does this send to the crypto space?
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDropletsvip
· 12-05 22:34
The SEC's move this time is really brilliant; the crazy leverage ratios should have been regulated long ago. Invesco postponing the vote at this timing shows they really understand everything. Waiting to see what happens next—feels like there might be some action on crypto-related regulations too.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegenvip
· 12-05 22:34
As soon as SEC stepped in, I knew someone was going to get rekt. This time the leverage competition is getting way too wild, it's time to hit the brakes.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 12-05 22:31
That move by the SEC is truly ruthless, putting a direct stop to those fund managers’ leverage race... Forget it, how much longer can this kind of thing last anyway? Invesco taking a pause this time is actually smart—wait until things quiet down before making a move.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZKvip
· 12-05 22:15
The SEC is really tough this time, directly putting a stop to those leverage maniacs. Invesco has pulled back... Seems like everyone is guessing what the regulators will do next.
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlackervip
· 12-05 22:10
SEC must have been scared, those leveraged ETFs are indeed played a bit aggressively.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)