The controversy surrounding a certain disputed figure in the community can pretty much be put to rest now. To be honest, I've been observing this person for quite a while. I noticed issues with her data as early as last year and discussed it privately with some friends at the time, but since she was a woman, I chose not to make it public. However, after this recent donation fraud incident came to light, I felt I couldn't stay silent any longer.
In fact, many people might not know that as early as a year ago, some had already noticed irregularities in her actions. The data she posted was often inconsistent, and sometimes the timestamps in her screenshots didn't even match up. Originally, since our paths cross frequently in this space, I thought we could just turn a blind eye and let it go.
But donation fraud is a different matter—it's not just about falsifying data, it directly crosses the community's bottom line. That's why, together with a few friends who were among the first to notice these issues, we organized the evidence. We've said what needed to be said and done what needed to be done. Hopefully, the community will pay more attention to these kinds of incidents in the future.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BakedCatFanboy
· 16h ago
The timestamps don't match at all, this is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 16h ago
Fake donations like this are truly intolerable; they should have been exposed long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 16h ago
I saw through it a long time ago. When the data was being faked, someone should have spoken up. Only exposing it now is just too late.
Faking donations is definitely crossing the line—stuff like that absolutely needs to be called out.
But to be fair, there are plenty of people like this in the community, but very few actually dare to go public. This time, at least, it took some courage.
Wait, another "didn’t expose because she's a girl" excuse? That logic is really a mess.
Anyway, it's good that this is over—no more seeing it spammed everywhere. Let's get back to normal discussions.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 16h ago
Fake donations really can't be tolerated anymore; they should have been exposed long ago. Data manipulation is one thing, but this is straight-up scamming the community. The community needs to learn a lesson.
The controversy surrounding a certain disputed figure in the community can pretty much be put to rest now. To be honest, I've been observing this person for quite a while. I noticed issues with her data as early as last year and discussed it privately with some friends at the time, but since she was a woman, I chose not to make it public. However, after this recent donation fraud incident came to light, I felt I couldn't stay silent any longer.
In fact, many people might not know that as early as a year ago, some had already noticed irregularities in her actions. The data she posted was often inconsistent, and sometimes the timestamps in her screenshots didn't even match up. Originally, since our paths cross frequently in this space, I thought we could just turn a blind eye and let it go.
But donation fraud is a different matter—it's not just about falsifying data, it directly crosses the community's bottom line. That's why, together with a few friends who were among the first to notice these issues, we organized the evidence. We've said what needed to be said and done what needed to be done. Hopefully, the community will pay more attention to these kinds of incidents in the future.