#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 The recent remarks from the SEC's new chairman, Paul Atkins, are quite interesting. He said that in the coming years, US finance may accelerate towards "tokenization" and "on-chain" processes, with traditional assets gradually moving to blockchain trading, resulting in higher efficiency and greater transparency.
But it's important to clarify—he's not saying the entire financial system should switch to Bitcoin's model. Although some headlines exaggerate, what Atkins really means is: the trend is changing, digital assets will gradually integrate into mainstream finance, not fully replace the existing system. The direction is right, but it's not that radical.
To support this shift, the US is indeed rolling out some new policies. For example, there's a regulatory framework for stablecoins and innovation exemption clauses, with the aim of making it easier for crypto companies to enter compliant markets. In recent years, institutional funds have also been clearly increasing their holdings of digital assets, treating them as a routine part of investment portfolios.
That said, market volatility remains an old problem. The price movements of coins like $LUNC show that sharp rises and falls are still the norm. While regulations are improving, many details haven't been fully implemented yet, so it's premature to say that "crypto has fully gone mainstream."
Overall assessment? The general direction is accelerating in this area—institutions, policies, and technology are all pushing forward—but it'll probably take a few more years to truly get there. Right now, it feels more like a transition from "edge experimentation" to the "formal integration phase."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretful
· 12-07 00:18
Atkins’ theory sounds reasonable, but it’s pretty much the same story told to venture capitalists—it sounds good, but implementation is a different matter. Tokenization is indeed a trend, but right now it’s still in the hype phase. The real institutional whales have already been making moves on the dark web, while we retail investors are still waiting for regulatory frameworks to be improved.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCat
· 12-07 00:16
Nap warning... Atkins sounds good in theory, but execution in detail is key. We're still in a transition period, so don't be fooled by the headlines.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 12-07 00:13
Tokenization sounds great, but the devil is in the details.
The stablecoin framework looks good, but I'm afraid it's just another paper exercise.
A few years? I think it'll take another ten years, regulations just can't keep up.
The same old hype and suppression routine, it's always like this.
Just take what Atkins says with a grain of salt, don't take it too seriously.
Institutions are indeed entering the market, but retail investors are still the ones getting fleeced.
That LUNC crash really taught me a lesson, you just can't prevent a nosedive.
If it's a consolidation period, so be it. The cycle still has a long way to go anyway.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 12-07 00:13
Starting to draw big promises again—let’s wait until the regulations are actually implemented.
---
Mainstream adoption? Ha, take care of the LUNC issue before bragging.
---
No matter how good it sounds, it doesn’t change the fact that it’s still basically gambling right now.
---
A few years? I’m afraid I can’t wait that long, but the direction is definitely right.
---
The trend is correct, but if the details aren’t handled well, it’s all for nothing—everyone knows that.
---
Institutions are really coming in, but don’t take the SEC’s hints as gospel—there’s always risk.
---
How much longer is this transition phase going to last? Feels like we’re always in transition.
---
How many times have we heard Atkins say this? Anyway, I’ll just keep doing my regular investments.
---
Not aggressive? Then when will the regulations actually arrive? Everyone’s tired of waiting.
---
Don’t be fooled by these statements—the market is what really matters.
#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 The recent remarks from the SEC's new chairman, Paul Atkins, are quite interesting. He said that in the coming years, US finance may accelerate towards "tokenization" and "on-chain" processes, with traditional assets gradually moving to blockchain trading, resulting in higher efficiency and greater transparency.
But it's important to clarify—he's not saying the entire financial system should switch to Bitcoin's model. Although some headlines exaggerate, what Atkins really means is: the trend is changing, digital assets will gradually integrate into mainstream finance, not fully replace the existing system. The direction is right, but it's not that radical.
To support this shift, the US is indeed rolling out some new policies. For example, there's a regulatory framework for stablecoins and innovation exemption clauses, with the aim of making it easier for crypto companies to enter compliant markets. In recent years, institutional funds have also been clearly increasing their holdings of digital assets, treating them as a routine part of investment portfolios.
That said, market volatility remains an old problem. The price movements of coins like $LUNC show that sharp rises and falls are still the norm. While regulations are improving, many details haven't been fully implemented yet, so it's premature to say that "crypto has fully gone mainstream."
Overall assessment? The general direction is accelerating in this area—institutions, policies, and technology are all pushing forward—but it'll probably take a few more years to truly get there. Right now, it feels more like a transition from "edge experimentation" to the "formal integration phase."