Recently, I found two quite interesting assets. One is a project endorsed by a top figure after admitting a mistake, and the other is a token publicly backed by He Yi. Judging from the current valuation, the cost performance is indeed good, making them suitable for early positioning.



Contract addresses:
0xacacb00282e539d435123c868deae28a6b1d4444
0x3c9e12b66dd442df8bafdc68982da03331694444
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FalseProfitProphetvip
· 12h ago
The big guy can turn over when he admits his mistake, so I can't figure it out... The first two times such "cost performance" cut half of my position
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 12-07 06:52
Wait, the contract address needs to go through a security audit first, otherwise how can we dare to use it?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 12-07 06:51
lol "性价比不错" is code for bag holding at ATH, ngl... opportunity cost on these blue-chip plays is wild rn. what's the liquidity depth actually look like on those contracts? 👀
Reply0
GasOptimizervip
· 12-07 06:49
How do you refer to on-chain data? Just looking at celebrity endorsements is meaningless. I need to check contract interactions and holding distributions—historical data is the optimal solution.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 12-07 06:40
Even a big shot admitted they were wrong, and you still dare to follow? I can't trust He Yi's endorsement either.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)