Why have Elon Musk and Jensen Huang both started talking about the concept of "energy currency"? On the surface, it seems like they're just labeling Bitcoin, but in reality, they may be hitting on a key pain point in the US power sector.



The US doesn't actually lack resources—coal reserves are abundant, and there's plenty of natural gas and oil. The real bottleneck is the outdated power delivery system.

Want to build a new high-voltage power line? Get ready for a decade-long argument. By the time the project is actually implemented, there might have been two changes in the White House. The approval process moves at a snail's pace, with efficiency so low it's almost unbelievable.

So the core issue isn't a lack of resources to mine, but that this approval mechanism has dragged grid upgrades into a never-ending project. The result is that the power network can't keep up with modern demands, and the presence of power-hungry Bitcoin in the US seems especially ironic—you call it "energy currency," but you can't even supply enough electricity.
BTC-1.03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlippedSignalvip
· 12h ago
Haha, at the end of the day, it’s just that the US power grid system is a complete mess. It takes ten years to approve a single line—what an incredible level of efficiency. --- The concept of energy currency sounds fancy, but aging infrastructure is the real Achilles' heel. Without solid infrastructure, everything else is pointless. --- So basically, Musk and Jensen Huang are indirectly criticizing the US government, right? Their words are full of subtle frustration. --- Stop talking about mining or not mining—the real bottleneck is electricity. Bitcoin is just the trigger. --- This US approval system really is a heavyweight drag, and it’s ironic how the grid upgrade has been delayed for so long. --- Instead of chasing after Bitcoin, why not modernize the damned power grid first? That’s the real core issue. --- It’s not a lack of resources, it’s a lack of proper systems. That’s why US infrastructure has always been mediocre.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 12-07 08:46
Seriously, the US approval system is just ridiculous. It can take ten years just to get a high-voltage line approved—that's even more of a hassle than mining. No wonder Musk and Jensen Huang keep talking about "energy currency." Basically, they're just pushing back against that zombie system.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 12-07 08:46
Haha, this really hits the mark. The US power grid is truly "antique level," even deeper than the settlement pitfalls I've encountered.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalistvip
· 12-07 08:46
The U.S. power grid really is an original sin—a single high-voltage line can get bogged down in disputes for ten years. That efficiency is unbelievable. No wonder Musk and others have to find alternative paths. In some ways, Bitcoin has actually become a kind of "stress test," hasn’t it?
View OriginalReply0
HackerWhoCaresvip
· 12-07 08:37
The outdated and broken U.S. power grid system is really something else. It takes ten years just to get a single transmission line approved. No wonder Musk and others had to sarcastically rename Bitcoin as "energy currency"...
View OriginalReply0
ArbitrageBotvip
· 12-07 08:26
To put it bluntly, it's just poor infrastructure. The old American system should have been phased out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)