2025-12-07 17:30:18

What's interesting about the #比特币对比代币化黄金 inscription protocol? Unlike tokens controlled by project teams, assets like BRC20 are already circulating on multiple exchanges and aren't considered high-risk meme coins. The global IP consensus is still there—think about how Bitcoin's early value came about. Everyone knows the story of trading two pizzas for BTC.

Right now, the market cap is still hovering at a low level, so if the community consensus builds up and is paired with good trading tools, it might just replicate the explosive growth path of some meme coins 📈 Of course, it's not recommended to go in heavy on this kind of thing—the key factors are how widely it spreads and how dispersed the holdings are. Sometimes, that's just how the market works 🔥

BTC-0.76%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHunterZhang

· 5h ago

The bottom range fluctuation is a buy signal. I've long been free-riding on the layout. --- Honestly, this BRC20 wave is an opportunity to make big profits quietly; only when the chips are dispersed can there be gains. --- We're tired of the pizza story. Now we're watching who the electricity bill party can hold on until consensus erupts. --- When trading tools are well-coordinated, this thing can really go all-in, but I still prefer reinvestment and avoid heavy positions. --- I'm most afraid of zeroing out at low market cap. For these kinds of things, you need a pancake strategy—run when the harvesters come. --- IP consensus sounds good in theory, but in reality, it depends on how long retail investors can interact and harvest the wool.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 16h ago

Blowing well, but are the people who buy it making money now? BRC20 is indeed more reliable than Tugou, but liquidity is still a problem. It's a consensus theory again, to put it bluntly, someone still has to take over. What does it mean to hover at a low level? No heat, let alone meme coins. I've heard this too many times, and in the end it's the most lost. The inscription is indeed fresh, but I really dare to take a heavy position and admire you.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 19h ago

Oh my god, there are so many low-price retail investors holding chips. When the price surges, who will be the buyers?

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 12-08 09:19

Low-position chips being dispersed is indeed attractive, but the real concern is a consensus breakdown.

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropAgain

· 12-07 18:00

Alright, once consensus is reached, it will skyrocket. I’ve heard this theory too many times.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 12-07 18:00

Low-priced chips are dispersed, not as messy as shitcoins. That's actually a good point.

View OriginalReply0

OnlyOnMainnet

· 12-07 17:50

That's right, it all depends on whether the consensus can be hyped up. --- BRC20 liquidity is decent. If the volume really picks up, you never know. --- Consolidating at low levels is an opportunity; the real concern is whether there's enough buzz. --- Consensus is pretty vague; the key is whether any big KOLs will endorse it. --- Retail investors are always betting on how far things can spread, haha. --- If the trading tools are good, they can speed things up, but the worst is when scam projects get mixed in. --- The pizza story is legendary—it's really hard to say if it can be replicated now. --- High chip distribution is the real deal; don't get rekt again. --- The market is a psychological game—the side with more believers wins. --- Going all-in is asking for trouble; small positions are okay to try.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 12-07 17:40

Yeah, don’t get fooled by “decentralization”—just because BRC20 tokens are widely circulated doesn’t mean there’s no risk. I’ve seen too many contracts listed on exchanges die out really fast. The key is whether the smart contract itself has vulnerabilities. Don’t count on community consensus. Decentralized token distribution sounds nice, but in reality? Early whale investors can dump on you just like in traditional projects, there’s no fundamental difference from centralized control. Instead of waiting for a pump, you’re better off auditing the protocol’s contract code first. Integer overflows and permission control vulnerabilities can wipe you out overnight.

View OriginalReply0

WalletInspector

· 12-07 17:36

Yeah, pretty much. It just depends on whether the community can really break out of its niche.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 12-07 17:32

Low-priced chips are scattered, that's the key; otherwise, it will just be another field for market makers.

View OriginalReply0