#数字货币市场洞察 Why hasn’t this cycle produced a proper altcoin season? It’s not that the industry is lacking, it’s that valuation bubbles have thrown off the rhythm. Conservatively, the crypto sector still has at least ten years to run.
What do retail investors fear most? Chasing hot trends only to end up as bag holders. Stay away from those projects with flashy whitepapers but nothing actually delivered. If you really want to pick projects, just focus on two dimensions: technical barriers and brand momentum. As for revenue numbers or user growth, the cost of faking those is too low, so their reference value is limited.
How to look at the technical side? Take Ethereum as an example—its complexity is on par with enterprise-level distributed databases, which supports its valuation. Following this logic, projects like NEAR with strong technical foundations and room for iteration are worth a closer look.
Another path is to buy attention. Whether it’s Dogecoin or Trumpcoin, at the core, it’s about trading on the value of “being remembered.” In an age of information overload, meme coins that can occupy mindshare actually have a moat.
Simply put, either bet on projects with a high technical ceiling or those with strong cultural penetration. For the rest of those mediocre altcoins, regular people really don’t need to gamble on them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningLady
· 3h ago
I agree, this round is really boring. No matter how much the whitepaper hypes it up, it’s useless if the underlying technology can’t hold up.
Chasing hot trends is the easiest way to get burned. I have friends who got stuck like that and now they don’t dare touch those unknown coins anymore.
I actually think meme coins are more honest; at least everyone knows they’re betting on hype, and no one is fooling themselves. It’s better than those projects pretending to have potential.
I’m also watching NEAR. The tech is pretty solid, just depends on how they iterate going forward.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 12-08 02:58
What you said is absolutely right; most people simply can't tell the difference between technology and hype.
To be honest, I've been lurking in NEAR for a while now, but what I'm most afraid of is these project teams hyping things up and then running off.
Meme coins can indeed make money, but that's a game of probability, not investing.
Ten years? I doubt it. Policy risk is the real killer.
This cycle is honestly boring; all the liquidity has been locked up by the whales.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 12-08 02:58
You're absolutely right, I've fallen into that trap myself. I once chased after some crappy coin—the whitepaper was hyped up like crazy, but in the end, the team ran off with the money. Now I just consider it tuition fees for learning.
These days, when I evaluate projects, I mainly look at the tech and reputation—the rest is just fluff. NEAR is actually pretty solid, with a robust tech stack.
But when it comes to meme coins, I'm still hesitant. The risks just seem too high, and it's hard to tell when they're going to crash.
A ten-year cycle for the sector sounds reasonable, at least it gives us room to maneuver. Just don't rush to go all in.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 12-08 02:56
Hi, straight to the point—those trash whitepaper projects should have been cleaned out long ago.
Honestly, this wave of meme coins has really found a new moat, way better than those fake utility projects.
NEAR is a good choice, no doubt about its solid technology.
Ten years? I doubt it, but there will still be a bull market—the main thing is whether you can avoid getting wrecked.
If a whitepaper is all flashy talk, just blacklist it—no need to waste your time.
Projects with solid technical foundations are definitely worth paying attention to; the rest are just gambling.
Trying to buy the dip almost wiped me out—focusing on tech is definitely more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 12-08 02:49
Damn, it's that same old "technical potential" talk again... Sounds easy, but how many people are actually making real money?
A moat for meme coins? Haha, the old-timers aren't smiling anymore.
Those who shouted "can still run for ten years," how are they doing now?
NEAR? Why does that look so familiar... just another one waiting for a bull run.
Honestly, what worries me most are these so-called "smart analyses"... those are often the easiest traps to fall into.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 12-08 02:43
What you said is absolutely right. Most people simply can't tell the difference between a technical ceiling and a worthless coin, yet they're still chasing the next big thing.
The problem now is that the information gap is too wide, and retail investors have been exploited to the point of numbness.
This meme coin wave is indeed interesting—attention itself is a scarce resource.
What I fear most are those junk projects with neither technical merit nor cultural attributes; they really are just a waste of time.
#数字货币市场洞察 Why hasn’t this cycle produced a proper altcoin season? It’s not that the industry is lacking, it’s that valuation bubbles have thrown off the rhythm. Conservatively, the crypto sector still has at least ten years to run.
What do retail investors fear most? Chasing hot trends only to end up as bag holders. Stay away from those projects with flashy whitepapers but nothing actually delivered. If you really want to pick projects, just focus on two dimensions: technical barriers and brand momentum. As for revenue numbers or user growth, the cost of faking those is too low, so their reference value is limited.
How to look at the technical side? Take Ethereum as an example—its complexity is on par with enterprise-level distributed databases, which supports its valuation. Following this logic, projects like NEAR with strong technical foundations and room for iteration are worth a closer look.
Another path is to buy attention. Whether it’s Dogecoin or Trumpcoin, at the core, it’s about trading on the value of “being remembered.” In an age of information overload, meme coins that can occupy mindshare actually have a moat.
Simply put, either bet on projects with a high technical ceiling or those with strong cultural penetration. For the rest of those mediocre altcoins, regular people really don’t need to gamble on them.