Fed Meeting This Week Reveals Division—Rates Will Be Cut, But Hawkish Stance Remains
This week’s FOMC meeting revealed an interesting detail: while a rate cut is almost certain, there was an unusually rare split with five members voting against it. The underlying logic is sobering—the policy committee wants to balance easing with fighting inflation, and Powell is trying to strike a balance between two extremes.
The term "hawkish rate cut" has been everywhere lately, and it’s essentially a paradox: rates are being lowered, but the messaging remains tough. Will the easing continue in January? The official answer is maximum caution.
Bank of America’s analysis team pointed out a real issue: at the last meeting (October), it was still possible to “play tai chi” to calm expectations, but this time it’s much harder. Between the two meetings, a slew of key economic data was released, much of it delayed due to the government shutdown, which has made market guidance much more difficult.
JPMorgan’s perspective is more rooted in the labor market—once rates approach the so-called “neutral level,” whether to loosen further can’t be decided by political will; it depends on employment data. That’s a hard constraint, with no room to maneuver.
Global capital is now waiting for one signal: can Powell use his words to keep both sides’ expectations in check? The degree of division this time, in some ways, is an even greater test of the decision-makers’ communication skills than before.
The underlying mechanism is actually more worthy of attention—reshaping liquidity expectations will directly shake up the asset pricing system. This isn’t an empty prediction; it’s a logical chain laid bare by market structure. By the time everyone reacts, the capital has already been reallocated. So the real question now isn’t “Will the market rise?” but “Have you positioned yourself in advance?”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfCustodyIssues
· 12-08 10:44
Powell is really trying to please both sides this time, talking smoother than singing.
---
Five people opposed? That’s a signal the market is waging a price war.
---
Rate cuts are happening, but the hawkish stance remains tough... the logic is falling apart.
---
I hear about "early positioning" every week, I just want to know who actually did it early.
---
Liquidity reshaping? The funds have already left, and retail investors are still waiting for a signal.
---
Lower rates but a tough tone, this is exactly the "wanting both ways" feeling.
---
JPMorgan is right, in the end it all comes down to employment data, everything else is just noise.
---
Easing in January? I get the officials’ cautious attitude—they have no intention to ease.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 12-08 10:41
This hawkish rate cut trick... to put it bluntly, is just trying to fool the market into buying in again, but the smart money has already started reallocating. Meanwhile, we retail investors are still staring at the K-line charts.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 12-08 10:40
A rate cut is a rate cut, but medical records show that this internal split was pretty severe—five dissenters indicate that the hawkish symptoms haven't eased yet. The real test lies in liquidity restructuring—fund allocation patterns will show clinical signs 3-6 months earlier than official statements. Still waiting? That's too late.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 12-08 10:38
Powell really couldn't hold it together this time. Five dissenting votes is pretty interesting—it shows there's real internal conflict. The rate cut is just a smokescreen; fighting inflation is the real deal. I see right through this move.
The big money has already left, and us retail investors are still waiting for a signal—what a joke. Those who positioned early have already made a killing.
“Hawkish rate cuts” sounds like a contradiction. Rates are dropping but the rhetoric is still tough—so are they loosening or tightening? Can they just be straightforward for once?
Employment data is the real key; everything else is just noise. The labor market is what really counts. We need to keep a close eye on that next year.
Liquidity reshaping? Come on, that's happened a million times already. Now it's just about who reacts slowly and loses out.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 12-08 10:21
This hawkish rate cut rhetoric is just digging a hole for retail investors—easing liquidity on one hand while talking tough on the other. If they really dare to continue easing in January, I'll livestream myself eating a keyboard.
After all the hype around rate cut expectations, in the end, five votes against it. This pace is honestly disappointing; funds have probably already been reallocated by now.
“Liquidity expectation reshaping” sounds nice, but in reality, by the time we retail investors react, it’s already time to take a loss.
Those who positioned themselves early are laughing now. For those of us still waiting for a signal, most likely we’re just waiting to get cut.
Powell’s mouth really knows how to stir things up, trying to hold down both sides. Feels like a scam to take our money.
#美联储重启降息步伐 $ETH $BNB $ZEC
Fed Meeting This Week Reveals Division—Rates Will Be Cut, But Hawkish Stance Remains
This week’s FOMC meeting revealed an interesting detail: while a rate cut is almost certain, there was an unusually rare split with five members voting against it. The underlying logic is sobering—the policy committee wants to balance easing with fighting inflation, and Powell is trying to strike a balance between two extremes.
The term "hawkish rate cut" has been everywhere lately, and it’s essentially a paradox: rates are being lowered, but the messaging remains tough. Will the easing continue in January? The official answer is maximum caution.
Bank of America’s analysis team pointed out a real issue: at the last meeting (October), it was still possible to “play tai chi” to calm expectations, but this time it’s much harder. Between the two meetings, a slew of key economic data was released, much of it delayed due to the government shutdown, which has made market guidance much more difficult.
JPMorgan’s perspective is more rooted in the labor market—once rates approach the so-called “neutral level,” whether to loosen further can’t be decided by political will; it depends on employment data. That’s a hard constraint, with no room to maneuver.
Global capital is now waiting for one signal: can Powell use his words to keep both sides’ expectations in check? The degree of division this time, in some ways, is an even greater test of the decision-makers’ communication skills than before.
The underlying mechanism is actually more worthy of attention—reshaping liquidity expectations will directly shake up the asset pricing system. This isn’t an empty prediction; it’s a logical chain laid bare by market structure. By the time everyone reacts, the capital has already been reallocated. So the real question now isn’t “Will the market rise?” but “Have you positioned yourself in advance?”