2025-12-08 21:28:30

The wisest move for teams and founders operating a Launchpad is actually to keep quiet. Don’t publicly comment on which tokens will perform well and which won’t. Think about it—if they try to influence public opinion through statements and selectively promote certain tokens on their own platform, what do they gain? Almost nothing. On the contrary, it’s easy for this approach to backfire.

To put it bluntly, once you endorse a particular project, how do you think the communities of the other tokens not mentioned will feel? And what if the token you favor tanks, or the one you didn’t like ends up surging? Wouldn’t that be embarrassing? It’s better to let the market speak for itself; staying neutral is the long-term strategy. After all, the essence of a Launchpad is to serve as a platform for launching projects—their success depends on their own strength and market acceptance. If the platform gets too involved, it only invites trouble.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTRegretful

· 12-09 19:27

This logic is brilliant; indeed, one shouldn't blindly take sides.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 12-09 05:39

Haha, that's a brilliant way to put it. The platforms really should learn to play dumb. --- Damn, I'm already sick of those so-called clever Launchpads. --- You're absolutely right, picking sides is basically suicide. --- Playing dead is the smartest move for platforms—whenever they speak up, it backfires. --- But wait, then how do they attract users? --- Being neutral is easy to say, but hard to do, bro. --- The most awkward moments are when they get slapped in the face, seriously. --- But in reality, some Launchpads have already picked a side.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 12-08 21:58

Ha, that's what you call shooting yourself in the foot. Look at those platforms rushing to take sides, do they really think they're influencers? --- That's right, as soon as the platform speaks up, they come off as unprofessional, and in the end, they can't shift the blame. --- Just waiting—someone always fails to learn the lesson of keeping their mouth shut. --- Being neutral is easier said than done; it takes some self-control. --- If platforms were really smart, they'd just let projects live or die on their own, and stop meddling. --- I've seen too many disasters—never seen a platform gain a good reputation by taking a public stand. --- I really don't get why they insist on coming out and getting scolded. Isn't it better to stay mysterious? --- Everyone understands this logic, but some people just want to chase the hype, and end up falling flat themselves.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleShadow

· 12-08 21:58

What you said is absolutely right; platform endorsements are just suicidal marketing. Why can’t these people figure it out?

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 12-08 21:58

That's absolutely spot on—saying too much is always a mistake. Just look at those who were constantly hyping up coins every day—what ended up happening to them?

View OriginalReply0

PebbleHander

· 12-08 21:52

Honestly, this logic should have been pointed out a long time ago. Whenever the platform speaks up, it's a trap. Rather than endorsing them, it's better to just be a neutral messenger.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 12-08 21:47

That's way too absolute. There are still so many operators blindly endorsing things out there.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichMaker

· 12-08 21:46

Makes sense, Launchpad really shouldn't do this. Supporting one coin is equivalent to offending the others, so why bother?

View OriginalReply0

BuyHighSellLow

· 12-08 21:39

Haha, that's why those platforms are all starting to play dead. Really smart.