Major mining operations just slashed their green spending plans hard. We're talking a drop from $17.3B down to barely $2.2B for decarbonisation this decade. That's a massive pivot on environmental commitments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleMinion
· 12-09 05:09
So funny, what happened to the green commitment? Turned around and cut 80%—this move is unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 12-09 02:50
Damn, from 17.3 billion straight down to 2.2 billion? Isn’t that insane? What happened to the promised environmental commitment?
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 12-09 02:45
Haha, this move is brilliant. So much for environmental protection; it's already been compromised.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 12-09 02:40
17.3 billion directly slashed to 2.2 billion? Haha, this is exactly the kind of "commitment" that Web3 folks always talk about.
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 12-09 02:28
Huh? From 17.3 billion slashed directly to 2.2 billion, that’s a really drastic change.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 12-09 02:21
Hi, wow... The promised 17.3 billion suddenly shrank to 2.2 billion, that's quite a drastic difference.
Major mining operations just slashed their green spending plans hard. We're talking a drop from $17.3B down to barely $2.2B for decarbonisation this decade. That's a massive pivot on environmental commitments.