In the early years, a certain mainstream currency did not dare to get on the car when it was low, and now looking back, it is really regrettable. This time, seeing CZ's strong support for $ASTER, I plan to start slowly laying out around $1 - but definitely not a shuttle.
Let's talk about why you are paying attention to this project first: the trading volume of Perpetual DEX reached 1.5 trillion yuan last year, and Aster's single-day revenue soared to $14.33 million, becoming the second largest platform in the world, leaving Hyperliquid behind. Its dual-mode trading system with 1001x leverage and hidden order functions can be found by both retail investors and institutions. The technical architecture is said to follow the underlying solution of a leading exchange, and stability is indeed guaranteed. More importantly, the tokenomics model - 50% of revenue is directly burned, the unlocking period is postponed to 2035, and the short-term selling pressure will theoretically be halved.
But if you look at it calmly, the risks are also obvious: the top 10 wallets control 91% of the token circulation, and the risk of centralization is there; Hyperliquid holds 75% of the market share; It has fallen by 35% in the past three months, and the possibility of continuing to bottom cannot be ignored.
But to be honest, I'm convinced by CZ's judgment. Back then, he sold houses and studed Bitcoin's ruthlessness, and now he bets heavily on Aster, and I bet that I can get a piece of the pie with people who have a vision for a long time.
My way of playing is very simple: open positions in batches below $1, never all in (everyone understands the volatility of altcoins), first reduce the cost, and then wait for half a year. If the macro environment is really as loose as expected next year, and institutional funds enter the market, there should be drama on this track.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinTherapist
· 12-10 04:56
91% of the circulation is in the hands of large households, what kind of fun is this, it is really planted as leeks
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 12-10 04:54
91% of the circulation is in the hands of large players, which is outrageous, no different from casinos
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 12-10 04:51
Wait, 91% of the circulation is in the hands of large investors, why does this feel more dangerous
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 12-10 04:48
Damn, 91% of the circulation of the top 10 wallets, this degree of centralization is a bit scary... But I do believe in CZ's bet, but I am afraid of being smashed
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 12-10 04:44
91% of the circulation is locked, which is a bet that CZ will not rug us...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 12-10 04:29
It's this set of statements again, I was moved as soon as CZ made a move, is it true this time or is it going to be cut again?
---
The idea of batch layout is not bad, but I am uncomfortable with 91% of it being in the hands of large households.
---
It is really uncertain whether the 35% decline can continue to bottom out, the bottom is still far away.
---
The big guy who followed the trend made money, and was also pitted by the big guy, so this time he had to take it easy.
---
The perpetual DEX track is indeed popular, but the pressure of Hyperliquid is not a joke, and it is clear whether the competition is fierce or not.
---
The destruction model sounds cool, and unlocking it to 2035 feels a bit ridiculous, and you still have to rely on the concept of speculation in the short term.
---
I will ask one thing, is this price real or false? I don't know what to do.
In the early years, a certain mainstream currency did not dare to get on the car when it was low, and now looking back, it is really regrettable. This time, seeing CZ's strong support for $ASTER, I plan to start slowly laying out around $1 - but definitely not a shuttle.
Let's talk about why you are paying attention to this project first: the trading volume of Perpetual DEX reached 1.5 trillion yuan last year, and Aster's single-day revenue soared to $14.33 million, becoming the second largest platform in the world, leaving Hyperliquid behind. Its dual-mode trading system with 1001x leverage and hidden order functions can be found by both retail investors and institutions. The technical architecture is said to follow the underlying solution of a leading exchange, and stability is indeed guaranteed. More importantly, the tokenomics model - 50% of revenue is directly burned, the unlocking period is postponed to 2035, and the short-term selling pressure will theoretically be halved.
But if you look at it calmly, the risks are also obvious: the top 10 wallets control 91% of the token circulation, and the risk of centralization is there; Hyperliquid holds 75% of the market share; It has fallen by 35% in the past three months, and the possibility of continuing to bottom cannot be ignored.
But to be honest, I'm convinced by CZ's judgment. Back then, he sold houses and studed Bitcoin's ruthlessness, and now he bets heavily on Aster, and I bet that I can get a piece of the pie with people who have a vision for a long time.
My way of playing is very simple: open positions in batches below $1, never all in (everyone understands the volatility of altcoins), first reduce the cost, and then wait for half a year. If the macro environment is really as loose as expected next year, and institutional funds enter the market, there should be drama on this track.