Malta's speed in securing MiCA approval actually has a traceable behind-the-scenes story.
The local VFA framework was already quite comprehensive years ago—regulatory boundaries are clear, and compliance pathways are well-defined, essentially building the scaffold in advance according to MiCA standards.
For example, a leading exchange started establishing roots there as early as 2018, gradually running through the entire chain from VFA Class 4 to MiCA CASP 3. This proactive positioning strategy now proves one thing: in the path of compliance, jumping ahead is much easier than catching up.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShamedApeSeller
· 2h ago
I've long seen it clearly; Malta's move this time truly demonstrates superior strategy. The VFA framework is so solidly established; MiCA coming is just an upgrade.
Others started laying the groundwork as early as 2018, and we're still catching up now. The gap is not just a little.
Actually, it's a matter of choosing the right track—entering early means profit.
Wait, how many projects are only now realizing they need to go compliant...
Jumping out quickly is really key; latecomers still want to overtake on the bend? Dream on.
By the way, what is the status of those exchanges that established themselves earliest? They've definitely made a profit.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 12-11 17:01
It's been obvious for a long time. True big players never compete with retail investors for the trending opportunities; laying low in advance is the key. While we're still studying the documents, they've already gone compliant and are laying low.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 12-10 13:58
Indeed, Malta's move this time is quite bold... The VFA framework had already paved the way, no wonder exchanges are all heading there.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 12-10 13:54
Ha, Malta has indeed played it well this time, they started laying the groundwork early
Rooted in 2018? How happy are those exchanges laughing now
The thing about compliance race, frankly, is the difference between having foresight and not having it
Others are still exploring now, but they have already cleared the entire process
Wait, if you look at it this way, wouldn't Asia fall behind again
Only now realizing that learning from Malta feels already too late
But on the other hand, can early positioning really save so much trouble...
I somewhat understand why those exchanges are so eager to go overseas
This is the era of regulatory dividends, grabbing the first move is too important
If I had known earlier, I should have started planning in Malta back in 2018
They laid the foundation with the VFA framework, now transitioning directly to MiCA, that’s an excellent approach
But the real test probably starts now...
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonster
· 12-10 13:53
Jumping the gun is really a trick; those exchanges that were already laid out in Malta are now laughing the most comfortably.
Malta's speed in securing MiCA approval actually has a traceable behind-the-scenes story.
The local VFA framework was already quite comprehensive years ago—regulatory boundaries are clear, and compliance pathways are well-defined, essentially building the scaffold in advance according to MiCA standards.
For example, a leading exchange started establishing roots there as early as 2018, gradually running through the entire chain from VFA Class 4 to MiCA CASP 3. This proactive positioning strategy now proves one thing: in the path of compliance, jumping ahead is much easier than catching up.