Regulators just dropped some concerning findings. Preliminary investigation reveals nine major financial institutions may have crossed a line—turning away clients based on what industries they operate in, specifically those caught in political crossfire.
The banking watchdog's initial probe suggests these heavyweight players weren't exactly playing fair. They allegedly cherry-picked who deserves banking services, shutting out businesses tied to politically charged sectors. No names dropped yet, but the pattern's there.
What's particularly eyebrow-raising? This isn't about risk assessment or standard compliance checks. We're talking systematic exclusion of entire industry categories because they're politically touchy. That's a different ball game entirely.
Still early days in this investigation, but if these preliminary signs hold up under scrutiny, some of the banking world's biggest names could be facing serious questions about discrimination practices.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LowCapGemHunter
· 1h ago
ngl, this is the true face of the banking system. What's with all the compliance?
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 12-11 17:19
The actions taken by these nine major banks are indeed outrageous. Based on my analysis, this is essentially the financial industry's version of "selective service."
Industries that banks find unfavorable are directly cut off. On the surface, it's compliance, but in reality, it’s a form of discrimination. Interestingly, why haven't these issues been thoroughly investigated before?
Is this truly systemic exclusion or just isolated cases? The data will tell. Let's wait and see how the subsequent investigation unfolds.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者
· 12-10 23:05
ngl this is traditional finance doing political censorship, Web3 has seen through it a long time ago...
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 12-10 23:05
Nine banks engaging in systemic discrimination? This is outright political interference in finance, just settle on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 12-10 22:59
Here we go again, nine major banks are discriminating? The financial world is about to explode.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 12-10 22:58
Playing politics to拒客? The bank's move is really over the line.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 12-10 22:55
Is it the same old story? Banks selecting clients like choosing vegetables, it's really damn ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-10 22:46
Nine major banks treat customers differently; politically sensitive industries are directly banned? This is outrageous, it's not a risk control issue at all.
Regulators just dropped some concerning findings. Preliminary investigation reveals nine major financial institutions may have crossed a line—turning away clients based on what industries they operate in, specifically those caught in political crossfire.
The banking watchdog's initial probe suggests these heavyweight players weren't exactly playing fair. They allegedly cherry-picked who deserves banking services, shutting out businesses tied to politically charged sectors. No names dropped yet, but the pattern's there.
What's particularly eyebrow-raising? This isn't about risk assessment or standard compliance checks. We're talking systematic exclusion of entire industry categories because they're politically touchy. That's a different ball game entirely.
Still early days in this investigation, but if these preliminary signs hold up under scrutiny, some of the banking world's biggest names could be facing serious questions about discrimination practices.