The current spike in inflation might stem partly from tariff impacts—a phenomenon that could prove short-lived. However, here's the real concern: what if these price pressures don't fade as expected? What if they stick around longer than everyone anticipates?
That's why a more cautious approach made more sense. Holding back and letting things stabilize wouldn't have created significant additional downside risk. In fact, patience would've been the smarter play. Sometimes doing less is actually doing more for the economy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxAddict
· 12-15 10:18
The key is that no one can really predict when this wave of price increases will truly subside. If you ask me, it's better to play it safe.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 12-14 17:30
Hey, isn't that just saying to wait a bit and not rush? I've done this before. When I was grabbing羊毛, who didn't observe first before acting? The same principle applies to the economy now.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 12-13 22:36
Here we go again with the "wait and see" argument... Bro, you've heard this in 2021, and what happened? The key is, who can really "wait patiently" now? Money has depreciated.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTarotReader
· 12-13 03:06
Wait, are you saying the key phrase is "doing less actually leads to doing more"? Why do I feel like the central bank has never fully figured this out... Is early intervention not as good as late intervention? Could this be the reason why recent inflation has been so hard to control?
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 12-12 13:29
Honestly, it's now too late to regret... The key issue is why those decision-makers couldn't wait a bit longer? Why did they have to rush into action?
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 12-12 13:28
Wait, the key is whether these tariff pressures will really ease... I bet five bucks they won't dissipate that quickly.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 12-12 13:20
I should have held on earlier; now it's too late to regret.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 12-12 13:18
That's right, it was time to hit the brakes a long time ago. It's too late to regret now.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 12-12 13:17
Honestly, the key is whether this price increase can actually come down. No one can predict it right now.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartender
· 12-12 13:03
Well... That's right. Raising interest rates now is like pouring gasoline on a fire. It's better to sit back and wait and see.
The current spike in inflation might stem partly from tariff impacts—a phenomenon that could prove short-lived. However, here's the real concern: what if these price pressures don't fade as expected? What if they stick around longer than everyone anticipates?
That's why a more cautious approach made more sense. Holding back and letting things stabilize wouldn't have created significant additional downside risk. In fact, patience would've been the smarter play. Sometimes doing less is actually doing more for the economy.