Source: Coindoo
Original Title: Bank of England Faces Backlash Over Planned Stablecoin Limits
Original Link: https://coindoo.com/bank-of-england-faces-backlash-over-planned-stablecoin-limits/
A new political push is emerging in Westminster as lawmakers urge the UK Treasury to rethink how the country plans to regulate systemic stablecoins.
A cross-party group from both parliamentary chambers has written to Chancellor Rachel Reeves, arguing that the Bank of England’s proposed rulebook risks isolating the UK from the fast-moving global market for digital settlement assets.
Key Takeaways
UK lawmakers warn the Bank of England’s stablecoin plan could drive innovation and capital abroad.
Proposed caps and reserve rules are viewed as overly restrictive compared to the U.S. and EU.
Industry leaders say the UK risks losing its goal of becoming a top digital-asset hub.
Instead of offering a springboard for the domestic stablecoin industry, the BoE’s current approach could place British firms at a disadvantage, the letter warns. The signatories — which include former ministers, senior party figures and peers from both sides of the aisle — argue that several of the proposed restrictions would effectively freeze stablecoin innovation at the starting line.
Their concerns are not limited to one issue. The letter highlights a cluster of policies that, taken together, would constrain adoption: limits on how much individuals and companies can hold, a ban on wholesale usage outside a tightly controlled sandbox and rules preventing issuers from earning interest on their reserves.
In the lawmakers’ view, these measures would not protect the system — they would merely encourage users to rely on dollar-based stablecoins from abroad.
Industry Sees the Same Problem
UK-registered crypto firms say the political intervention reflects a wider sentiment among builders. Executives argue that stablecoins are already functioning as infrastructure, not experiments, and that the UK is in danger of regulating them as though they were still theoretical.
One senior exchange operator said the country risks “locking itself into a defensive stance while others open the door to real-world adoption.” Another industry voice noted that sterling-backed stablecoins currently make up a negligible portion of global supply — less than a tenth of a percent — and warned that policies built around hypothetical risks rather than market realities could cement that underperformance.
What the Bank of England Has Proposed
The BoE’s framework for systemic sterling stablecoins includes temporary caps of £20,000 per user and roughly £10 million for most businesses. Issuers would also have to keep a large portion of their reserves as non-interest-bearing deposits at the central bank.
Critics argue that this structure makes the economics of launching a competitive stablecoin nearly impossible. If issuers cannot earn interest on their backing assets while global competitors can, sterling-denominated tokens will always be less efficient, less attractive and less scalable.
International Landscape Looks Much More Open
The political frustration grows when compared to other leading jurisdictions.
Across the European Union, MiCA already provides a functioning framework that allows euro stablecoins to operate at scale while imposing guardrails only where monetary sovereignty is concerned. In the United States, the GENIUS Act has introduced a path for widespread use of regulated stablecoins in payments and settlement — without the hard caps London is considering.
For UK firms watching these developments, the message is clear: if Britain sets stringent limits while rivals encourage growth, capital and talent will naturally follow the friendliest environment.
Warning for the Treasury
The lawmakers’ letter argues that the UK’s ambition to become a global hub for digital assets is incompatible with a regime that restricts basic functionality. While the letter stops short of demanding that the BoE scrap its approach, it calls on the Chancellor to intervene before the policy “locks the UK into a fragmented and uncompetitive position.”
As one executive put it: “If pound-backed stablecoins are artificially constrained, activity won’t vanish — it will simply move offshore.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletManager
· 18h ago
The Bank of England's recent move is truly impressive. Want to restrict stablecoin liquidity? Wake up. On-chain data has long made it clear that compliance can actually increase risk levels. These regulators really want it both ways.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 18h ago
The Bank of England wants to stir up trouble again; they really just can't keep their hands off, huh?
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 18h ago
The Bank of England is really about to stir things up this time... As soon as the stablecoin restriction policy was announced, it caused an immediate uproar haha
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 18h ago
What is the Bank of England trying to do here? The stablecoin restrictions immediately caused the entire market to explode?
Bank of England Faces Backlash Over Planned Stablecoin Limits
Source: Coindoo Original Title: Bank of England Faces Backlash Over Planned Stablecoin Limits Original Link: https://coindoo.com/bank-of-england-faces-backlash-over-planned-stablecoin-limits/ A new political push is emerging in Westminster as lawmakers urge the UK Treasury to rethink how the country plans to regulate systemic stablecoins.
A cross-party group from both parliamentary chambers has written to Chancellor Rachel Reeves, arguing that the Bank of England’s proposed rulebook risks isolating the UK from the fast-moving global market for digital settlement assets.
Key Takeaways
Instead of offering a springboard for the domestic stablecoin industry, the BoE’s current approach could place British firms at a disadvantage, the letter warns. The signatories — which include former ministers, senior party figures and peers from both sides of the aisle — argue that several of the proposed restrictions would effectively freeze stablecoin innovation at the starting line.
Their concerns are not limited to one issue. The letter highlights a cluster of policies that, taken together, would constrain adoption: limits on how much individuals and companies can hold, a ban on wholesale usage outside a tightly controlled sandbox and rules preventing issuers from earning interest on their reserves.
In the lawmakers’ view, these measures would not protect the system — they would merely encourage users to rely on dollar-based stablecoins from abroad.
Industry Sees the Same Problem
UK-registered crypto firms say the political intervention reflects a wider sentiment among builders. Executives argue that stablecoins are already functioning as infrastructure, not experiments, and that the UK is in danger of regulating them as though they were still theoretical.
One senior exchange operator said the country risks “locking itself into a defensive stance while others open the door to real-world adoption.” Another industry voice noted that sterling-backed stablecoins currently make up a negligible portion of global supply — less than a tenth of a percent — and warned that policies built around hypothetical risks rather than market realities could cement that underperformance.
What the Bank of England Has Proposed
The BoE’s framework for systemic sterling stablecoins includes temporary caps of £20,000 per user and roughly £10 million for most businesses. Issuers would also have to keep a large portion of their reserves as non-interest-bearing deposits at the central bank.
Critics argue that this structure makes the economics of launching a competitive stablecoin nearly impossible. If issuers cannot earn interest on their backing assets while global competitors can, sterling-denominated tokens will always be less efficient, less attractive and less scalable.
International Landscape Looks Much More Open
The political frustration grows when compared to other leading jurisdictions.
Across the European Union, MiCA already provides a functioning framework that allows euro stablecoins to operate at scale while imposing guardrails only where monetary sovereignty is concerned. In the United States, the GENIUS Act has introduced a path for widespread use of regulated stablecoins in payments and settlement — without the hard caps London is considering.
For UK firms watching these developments, the message is clear: if Britain sets stringent limits while rivals encourage growth, capital and talent will naturally follow the friendliest environment.
Warning for the Treasury
The lawmakers’ letter argues that the UK’s ambition to become a global hub for digital assets is incompatible with a regime that restricts basic functionality. While the letter stops short of demanding that the BoE scrap its approach, it calls on the Chancellor to intervene before the policy “locks the UK into a fragmented and uncompetitive position.”
As one executive put it: “If pound-backed stablecoins are artificially constrained, activity won’t vanish — it will simply move offshore.”