Having spent ten years in digital asset trading, I’ve experienced three liquidation events. The most severe one was when a 10,000 USDT position was held all the way to zero, and thinking back, I still can’t help but smirk at that feeling. It’s these painful lessons that later helped me develop a set of methods that aren’t overly complicated but quite effective, with annual returns stabilizing around seven figures.
Friends often ask me: "Should I set stop-losses, or just hold through?" Actually, that’s the wrong question. The real difference isn’t about strictly following one rule or another, but about whether you can truly understand the underlying logic of the market.
**Stop-losses are not as sacred as you think**
In the beginning, I was a firm believer in stop-losses. "Stop-loss is just saving your life," I heard that so often it became a mantra. But in practice? Frequent stop-losses + fees + slippage, and within half a year, I lost all 8,000 USDT. Later, I realized the problem wasn’t with stop-losses themselves, but with blindly using them.
If your strategy can withstand extensive backtesting and has a high enough win rate, you actually don’t need to set stop-losses frequently. But there are exceptions—like trading altcoins or using 3x to 10x leverage—then you must set stop-losses, or an extreme market move could wipe out your account instantly.
**Hidden costs are the real killers**
Do you know who the biggest enemy of short-term trading is? It’s not market reversals, but fees and slippage. These two can eat up half of your profits.
Currently, I trade no more than five times a month. Sounds low, right? But each trade is based on trend signals—for example, I only enter when BTC breaks a key support level. This way, the profit from one trade can cover all the costs of multiple previous trades, and the psychological pressure is much lower.
**Leverage should match the asset**
This is often overlooked. Using 2x leverage on mainstream coins like BTC or ETH, as long as the trend isn’t completely broken, can withstand volatility. But if you’re using 2x leverage on altcoins? You’re not far from liquidation.
Conversely, even with 10x leverage, you should set proper stop-losses when trading altcoins. I once held a 10x leveraged position on an altcoin and got wiped out after a big bearish candle. That lesson is etched in my mind—I probably won’t forget it in this lifetime.
**Final words from the heart**
Having been in this market for ten years, I’ve stepped on more pits than I’ve made money. Those who keep shouting "You must set stop-losses" all the time…
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeepRabbitHole
· 14h ago
Ten years and three major crashes is really hardcore, but I still have some doubts about the claim of stable returns in the seven figures.
---
Well said, but it still feels like it's avoiding the topic of stop-loss. Honestly, it all comes down to luck.
---
The slippage and fees really hit me hard. After a month of over ten trades, I suffered huge losses.
---
Daring to play with 2x leverage on clone coins? I simply avoid that stuff.
---
It's been ten years and you're still emphasizing these basic things. Maybe you're not that impressive after all.
---
The worst feeling is when a single big bearish candle wipes everything out. Every time, I break out in a cold sweat.
---
Trading no more than 5 times a month sounds crazy, but it seems some people actually do it and make money.
---
Holding 10,000 USDT until it hits zero—what kind of mental resilience does that take? I would have lost sleep long ago.
---
They're all right, but the problem is most people simply don't understand the underlying logic; it's just gambling.
---
Seven-figure stable? If that's really true, I’d be bowing down. Feels like they're just telling stories.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 14h ago
The time when clearing 10,000 was truly a knockout, but then stabilizing at seven figures became outrageous. How big was the gap in between?
2x leverage BTC can handle, 10x altcoins can’t withstand a single bearish candle. That’s the difference between understanding and not understanding.
Frequent stop-losses wiped out 8,000. These fees and slippage are indeed invisible predators.
Ten years of falling into traps more than making money. That’s true, but in the end, being able to stabilize at seven figures—what do those earlier pitfalls matter?
The problem isn’t with stop-losses, but with the brain. I respect that statement.
Limiting to no more than 5 times a month seems inefficient, but each time yields big profits, which actually reduces psychological pressure. This mindset has some merit.
Altcoin traders, listen up, don’t be blinded by leverage.
The article is well-reasoned, but is the figure of stabilizing at seven figures real or just a myth?
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 14h ago
The trade that wiped out $10,000—I was there at the time. It was truly the moment my mindset collapsed.
---
I agree that monthly trading should not exceed 5 times, but it depends on individual execution capability.
---
People who frequently cut losses every day usually have no strategy; wasting fees is really pointless.
---
10x leverage on altcoins... that’s gambling with your life. No wonder it went to zero.
---
The key is to know what you’re doing, rather than blindly sticking to dogma.
---
I need to see backtest data to believe the statement about stable annual seven-figure returns.
---
Trading fees and slippage are really underestimated; most people lose their accounts because of this.
---
In essence, stop-loss is about risk management; there’s nothing sacred about it.
---
Not exceeding 5 times per month? Wow, I’m still doing intraday swings now.
---
Using leverage on BTC and altcoins definitely requires different approaches. There’s nothing wrong with that statement.
View OriginalReply0
RugDocDetective
· 14h ago
1. Losing 10,000 US dollars all at once, I think I heard the sound of the account exploding.
2. Holding positions and stop-loss are not mutually exclusive; the key is to stay alive and see the next bull market.
3. Fees and slippage, these two vampires, can really eat away half of your profit, it's too outrageous.
4. 2x leverage on altcoins? Might as well go all-in on gambling.
5. Falling into traps for ten years has more downsides than making money; I believe that, but a seven-figure annual return also raises questions.
6. Trading no more than 5 times a month sounds good, but can ordinary people really hold back...?
7. Stop-loss believers lost 8,000 yuan and only then realized, this tuition fee is a bit expensive.
8. Leveraging with specific assets, I haven't heard such detailed analysis from this angle.
9. An entire account wiped out by one big bearish candle—that's the price of greed.
10. Who truly understands the underlying logic of the market? Everyone's just armchair strategizing after the fact.
Having spent ten years in digital asset trading, I’ve experienced three liquidation events. The most severe one was when a 10,000 USDT position was held all the way to zero, and thinking back, I still can’t help but smirk at that feeling. It’s these painful lessons that later helped me develop a set of methods that aren’t overly complicated but quite effective, with annual returns stabilizing around seven figures.
Friends often ask me: "Should I set stop-losses, or just hold through?" Actually, that’s the wrong question. The real difference isn’t about strictly following one rule or another, but about whether you can truly understand the underlying logic of the market.
**Stop-losses are not as sacred as you think**
In the beginning, I was a firm believer in stop-losses. "Stop-loss is just saving your life," I heard that so often it became a mantra. But in practice? Frequent stop-losses + fees + slippage, and within half a year, I lost all 8,000 USDT. Later, I realized the problem wasn’t with stop-losses themselves, but with blindly using them.
If your strategy can withstand extensive backtesting and has a high enough win rate, you actually don’t need to set stop-losses frequently. But there are exceptions—like trading altcoins or using 3x to 10x leverage—then you must set stop-losses, or an extreme market move could wipe out your account instantly.
**Hidden costs are the real killers**
Do you know who the biggest enemy of short-term trading is? It’s not market reversals, but fees and slippage. These two can eat up half of your profits.
Currently, I trade no more than five times a month. Sounds low, right? But each trade is based on trend signals—for example, I only enter when BTC breaks a key support level. This way, the profit from one trade can cover all the costs of multiple previous trades, and the psychological pressure is much lower.
**Leverage should match the asset**
This is often overlooked. Using 2x leverage on mainstream coins like BTC or ETH, as long as the trend isn’t completely broken, can withstand volatility. But if you’re using 2x leverage on altcoins? You’re not far from liquidation.
Conversely, even with 10x leverage, you should set proper stop-losses when trading altcoins. I once held a 10x leveraged position on an altcoin and got wiped out after a big bearish candle. That lesson is etched in my mind—I probably won’t forget it in this lifetime.
**Final words from the heart**
Having been in this market for ten years, I’ve stepped on more pits than I’ve made money. Those who keep shouting "You must set stop-losses" all the time…