What if Aave eventually fragments into multiple protocol branches? Here's the real question—if that actually happens, which version would the community rally behind? You'd be looking at a scenario where governance decisions, liquidity distribution, and ecosystem alignment all come into play. The implications for DeFi lending markets could be pretty significant. Would users stick with the original, or would they diversify across competing Aave forks based on different strategic directions? It's worth thinking about how DAOs scale and maintain cohesion as they mature.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xDreamChaser
· 12-15 00:47
ngl if this really happens, liquidity fragmentation would be the real trouble...
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 12-15 00:38
Splitting? It should have happened a long time ago. As the ecosystem grows bigger, everyone wants to be the master.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 12-15 00:34
NGL, this issue is overcomplicated. The splitting process basically boils down to a battle of interests. In the end, it's just the big players deciding where to go, and retail investors follow the trend.
What if Aave eventually fragments into multiple protocol branches? Here's the real question—if that actually happens, which version would the community rally behind? You'd be looking at a scenario where governance decisions, liquidity distribution, and ecosystem alignment all come into play. The implications for DeFi lending markets could be pretty significant. Would users stick with the original, or would they diversify across competing Aave forks based on different strategic directions? It's worth thinking about how DAOs scale and maintain cohesion as they mature.