How vKAT Sustains Liquidity and Protocol Competition
The vKAT model operates as a self-reinforcing cycle. Token emissions are strategically directed to high-priority liquidity pools, which attracts traders and deepens on-chain execution quality. Deeper liquidity generates more trading volume and activity. That increased activity translates directly into protocol fees—revenue that gets channeled back to vKAT holders who participated in governance votes.
What makes this particularly elegant? Protocols effectively compete with each other by offering vote incentives to vKAT voters. The better the incentives, the more likely vKAT holders direct emissions their way. This competitive dynamic—where protocols bid for governance support through rewards—creates a flywheel. Voters are incentivized to allocate capital efficiently, protocols are incentivized to offer real value, and liquidity providers benefit from tighter spreads. The cycle repeats and strengthens.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMasked
· 14h ago
Hey, I like this flywheel logic, but I wonder if it will actually run that smoothly in practice.
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 15h ago
This flywheel logic is indeed excellent, but I'm worried that it might become a game of monopoly for major players later on.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 15h ago
To be honest, this flywheel sounds quite ideal, but can it actually be implemented successfully?
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 15h ago
vKAT's logic sounds good, but how many can really get it running? It seems like in the end, big investors still hold the power.
How vKAT Sustains Liquidity and Protocol Competition
The vKAT model operates as a self-reinforcing cycle. Token emissions are strategically directed to high-priority liquidity pools, which attracts traders and deepens on-chain execution quality. Deeper liquidity generates more trading volume and activity. That increased activity translates directly into protocol fees—revenue that gets channeled back to vKAT holders who participated in governance votes.
What makes this particularly elegant? Protocols effectively compete with each other by offering vote incentives to vKAT voters. The better the incentives, the more likely vKAT holders direct emissions their way. This competitive dynamic—where protocols bid for governance support through rewards—creates a flywheel. Voters are incentivized to allocate capital efficiently, protocols are incentivized to offer real value, and liquidity providers benefit from tighter spreads. The cycle repeats and strengthens.