Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
MakerDAO's financial landscape is quietly undergoing a major transformation. According to the latest monthly report, its RWA (Real World Assets) investment portfolio has surpassed $4.2 billion, which is not just a number but a fundamental shift in the protocol's revenue structure.
Specifically, the asset allocation includes: US short-term Treasury bonds ($2.41 billion, with an annual yield of 4.82%), followed by commercial real estate mortgages ($1.14 billion, mainly in New York and London), and corporate credit products ($680 million). This portfolio is no longer marginal—RWA income now accounts for 65% of the protocol's total revenue, directly driving the DAI stability fee from 3.2% down to 1.9%.
More importantly, founder Rune Christensen recently announced a plan to scale RWA to $15 billion by the end of 2025. Imagine that by then, DAI could be fully backed by real assets, effectively creating a real-world anchor for the entire DeFi ecosystem. MakerDAO is evolving from a purely on-chain protocol into a bridge connecting traditional finance and Web3.
The goal of 15 billion sounds crazy, Rune really dares to make promises, but actually making it work is the real key.
DAI stability fee reduced from 3.2% to 1.9%, this yield logic… feels like setting a trap for itself?
Wait, isn’t this just CeFi with a different disguise? Turning on-chain protocols into traditional financial tools is truly pointless.
Real-world anchor? Uh… Can things like US Treasuries be considered on-chain native anchors? That’s a bit ironic.