Ever wondered what actually separates Tornado Cash from Zama? One's all about transaction privacy through mixing protocols, while the other tackles confidential computation from a totally different angle. Curious what the real technical differences are under the hood? 🤔
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketGardener
· 2h ago
Haha, the mixing protocol is already outdated. True privacy should be protected at the computational power level.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 2h ago
Honestly, I've been confused about these two for a long time. Mixing coin protocols and privacy computing are completely different things. I need to think about it carefully.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasis
· 2h ago
Hybrid protocols and secure computation, they sound similar but are actually completely different things.
View OriginalReply0
HashBard
· 2h ago
ah, the eternal privacy theater vs. actual cryptographic sophistication... tornado's just shuffling deck chairs while zama's building whole new rooms, no? one's the narrative arc of "we hide stuff," the other's rewriting the plot entirely. curious which narrative the market will sentimentally attach itself to tbh
Reply0
TheMemefather
· 2h ago
Tornado Cash has already been exploited to the point of exhaustion; Zama is the real future.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 2h ago
Oh, these two things are not even in the same dimension; mixing coins and privacy computing are worlds apart.
Ever wondered what actually separates Tornado Cash from Zama? One's all about transaction privacy through mixing protocols, while the other tackles confidential computation from a totally different angle. Curious what the real technical differences are under the hood? 🤔