When it comes to blockchain privacy, most projects are just putting on a facade—the core remains the same, just sticking a patch on the outside. But some projects do things differently, changing things from the ground up.
The key difference is this: setting private account status as a standard system feature. On other public chains, transparency is inherent, and privacy must be added manually; here, it's the opposite—privacy is the factory default, and if you want transparency, you have to actively choose it.
This is not an upgrade or iteration; it's a complete overhaul of the mindset. Privacy has shifted from a feature that "you have to go out of your way to find" to "an integral part of the system, like breathing air." It's a structural-level transformation, with a completely different logic.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LucidSleepwalker
· 18h ago
Finally, someone has explained this clearly; all those other project privacy features are just decorative.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 01-06 15:54
This is the real reform. Other chains are just patching, while here we are directly changing the underlying logic.
Making privacy the default setting is a brilliant move, but can it really be maintained?
No hype, no blackening. Architecture transformation is easier to talk about than to do. Let's see how it is implemented later.
I like this approach. Finally, someone is no longer doing that superficial stuff.
Wait, can this really avoid regulatory trouble?
Privacy as a factory default sounds good, but will users pay for it? That’s the key.
Alright, another "revolutionary" plan. I'll wait and see for half a year.
This time feels different. It’s a fundamental surgery, unlike other projects that just scratch the surface.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 01-06 15:50
Oh, you hit the nail on the head. Some projects are just repackaging the same old thing.
I really admire the idea of reversing this architecture; making privacy a standard feature truly adds another dimension.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrower
· 01-06 15:47
This is the right way; privacy on other chains is just patchwork.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-06 15:46
Finally, someone has clarified this issue: privacy is the core, not a plugin. This is true reform.
When it comes to blockchain privacy, most projects are just putting on a facade—the core remains the same, just sticking a patch on the outside. But some projects do things differently, changing things from the ground up.
The key difference is this: setting private account status as a standard system feature. On other public chains, transparency is inherent, and privacy must be added manually; here, it's the opposite—privacy is the factory default, and if you want transparency, you have to actively choose it.
This is not an upgrade or iteration; it's a complete overhaul of the mindset. Privacy has shifted from a feature that "you have to go out of your way to find" to "an integral part of the system, like breathing air." It's a structural-level transformation, with a completely different logic.