A recent graded list of cryptocurrency narratives for 2026 has sparked quite a bit of discussion. According to the ranking, S-tier includes stablecoins, RWA, reputation systems, perpetual contracts, and prediction markets. This positioning seems quite reasonable, but I think the D-tier designation has issues. In fact, many on-chain activities are underestimated; the popularity and application prospects of these projects fully deserve higher recognition. What do you think about this ranking? Do you also feel that some narratives are being overlooked?

RWA0,82%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 01-10 12:21
Ha, it's this kind of ranking again. The S-level ones are indeed stable, but D-level is really being unfairly judged, right? Some small on-chain projects are exploding with strong support, the problem is that no one is paying attention.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptainvip
· 01-10 11:34
Ha, it's this kind of ranking again. I've long learned to read it backwards. Items in S grade are often the easiest to cut in half, and this time is no exception.

D grade being overlooked? Bro, that's exactly my signal to buy the dip. That's what I thought last time, and then my withdrawal card really became a tool for withdrawals.

Stablecoins and RWA sound fancy, but the most lively ones on-chain are actually lying in the most inconspicuous corners. I'm just a contrarian indicator; the more certain the list, the more anxious I get.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperervip
· 01-08 12:28
Ah, looking at this ranking, it just doesn't seem right. The D-level ones are really being overlooked.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobiavip
· 01-07 13:52
That D-level group should have turned things around long ago. In terms of actual on-chain utility, they are no less than S-level; it's just that no one is investing in them.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurkervip
· 01-07 13:50
The D-level ones are really unfair. I think some small niche applications have already surpassed S-level, and the rankings are completely out of sync with the current situation.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHuggervip
· 01-07 13:48
Grade D really underperforms, what's going on with these rating people... Small projects on the chain are being completely buried.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 01-07 13:47
That D-level group was really wrongfully accused; on-chain actual user engagement is much higher than S-level, it's just that no one praises it.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggarvip
· 01-07 13:33
NGL, this ranking is indeed outrageous. The D level clearly seems to be asleep, and some small narratives now have real users, okay?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin