The narrative design here is compelling. An original artist has already joined the team and is setting up their wallet on X. What's interesting is that similar high-profile figures have shown genuine interest in crypto projects before, even featuring them publicly at various points.



The real turning point comes when creator fees get properly routed back to the artists. That's when this could evolve from a simple runner mechanic into a full PVE experience. It's a smart play on the creator economy angle—compensating contributors directly transforms both the gameplay depth and the incentive structure. When artists see direct rewards flowing through, the quality of contributions typically follows.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 01-10 11:38
Really, creator fees are the key... Most projects are just hyping this up now, and if they don't directly share the revenue, it's doomed.

Wait, are the artists really setting up wallets this time? Maybe this time is different.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 01-09 15:07
Haha, really? Can the artists actually get paid? That's the key.
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictimvip
· 01-08 06:17
ngl this is what a Web3 game should look like... Artists being directly rewarded is the true incentive
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalystvip
· 01-07 13:53
The moment artist revenue sharing is implemented is the true turning point, this time it's different
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkepticvip
· 01-07 13:50
Speaking of which, the key point is that artists directly receive their share of the fees; otherwise, it's just an ordinary mini-game.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 01-07 13:46
Artists receive direct earnings? This is the true way Web3 should be

---

Only when creator fee distribution is well managed and the gaming experience is good can it truly take off

---

Damn, the original artists are coming in, this time it seems a bit different

---

PVE system + direct incentives, in simple terms, is to prevent creators from being exploited again

---

High-profile figures are rushing in, but it depends on whether the fee mechanism can truly be implemented

---

The key is that the money has to be in place, otherwise all creativity is pointless
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumpedvip
· 01-07 13:44
Wow, artists directly on-chain to get paid? That's the right way to do it!
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 01-07 13:43
ngl creator fees this part is indeed key, artists are willing to put in effort only when they have real cash

Huh, this time someone finally thought of giving the money directly to the creators? Why didn't those previous projects think of that

Small-scale runner projects are still too superficial, truly engaging ones rely on profit-sharing mechanisms... Exactly right

Another story about the creator economy, but this time it feels more serious?

When artists get paid properly, they will work diligently, isn't that common sense... Why couldn't so many previous projects figure this out
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 01-07 13:37
NGL, artists directly taking the money can indeed inspire creativity and is much more reliable than a worthless check.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 01-07 13:27
Artists have all opened their wallets this time, it's different now.

The creator fee is the core; it's only truly taking off the moment it's directly allocated to the creator.

When game depth and incentive mechanisms come together, quality naturally follows. This approach is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin