Bitcoin's rebound appears lackluster given the significance of the news—MSTR staying in the MSCI index should have fueled stronger upside momentum. The pullback is concerning.



Price action remains confined within Monday's trading range, with the market now probing support levels again. The yearly VWAP is critical here. Losing that threshold would be problematic and potentially signal further downside risk. This level needs to hold.
BTC0,83%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
LiquidityWizardvip
· 01-10 12:42
ngl the vwap not holding would statistically correlate with a ~40% probability of further cascade selling... theoretically speaking this should've pumped harder but here we are
Reply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-09 08:08
Nah, this rebound of BTC really isn't impressive. MSTR has stayed, and it's still like this? Kinda frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperervip
· 01-08 23:52
This rebound is weak; such a big positive for MSTR didn't even trigger a rally.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9vip
· 01-07 13:55
Speaking of MSTR remaining in the index, it should have exploded by now, but this rebound is a bit disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvestervip
· 01-07 13:55
Really, this news about MSTR should have caused a surge, but this is all? A bit disappointing...

If the support level breaks again, it might get cold, gotta hold the VWAP, brother.

Where's the strength in this rebound...

Wait, is this a shakeout? Something feels off.

Can't go down, can't go up, what's the holdup?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemistvip
· 01-07 13:54
ngl the energy here feels off... that yearly vwap is basically our philosopher's stone rn, lose it and the whole transmutation collapses fr
Reply0
GateUser-e19e9c10vip
· 01-07 13:48
MSTR didn't break out of the index and was supposed to go up, but it pulled back. What the heck...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 01-07 13:42
This news about MSTR indeed should have caused a rise, but the lackluster reaction indicates that market risk appetite is still very fragile. Once the annual VWAP is broken, the difficulty adjustment cycle usually moves downward. My mining rig's hash rate profit ratio has already been compressing over the past two weeks.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 01-07 13:39
MSTR should have been included in MSCI and triggered a rally, but what's the reaction now? No matter how high the node validation efficiency is, it can't withstand such weak consensus.

Once the annual VWAP breaks, it will be troublesome; the data is right here.

The rebound is weak, and staking yields are all discounted; network reliability needs to be reassessed.

To put it simply, the validation mechanism is not yet in place — the price discovery efficiency is too poor.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin